Hello There,
In compiling my application code ( petsc-2.3.3-p6), I get the following symbol SNESGetNumberLinearIterations, first defined. I checked the 2.3.3 changes file and It does mention of adding this function. I checked the manualpages and I could not find the function under SNES directory. Am I suppose to include any other header file? I have included "petscsnes.h" file in my code. Best Regards, ...Jagruti -----Original Message----- From: owner-petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lisandro Dalcin Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 17:08 To: petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov Subject: Re: Compiled information for Petsc 2.3.2-p10 Perhaps PETSc is not internally calling '/usr/local/bin/make' ?? Was '/usr/local/bin/test' in front of your $PATH when you configured PETSc? As Barry said, you can just ignore this, unless you have problems building your own source. In that case, please send 'configure.log' file. On 10/9/07, Trivedi, Jagruti CIV 470000D, 474300D <jagruti.trivedi at navy.mil> wrote: > > Hello Licendro, > > Here is the first question after the installation of petsc-2.3.3-p6. > > I ran: > Config/config.py --with-cc=gcc --with-fc=g77 > --download-f-blas-lapack=1 --download-mpich=1 > > /usr/local/bin/make all test /* run gnu make > > I get the following status error: > > Running test examples to verify correct installation c/C++ example > src/snes/examples/tutorials/ex19 run successfully with 1 MPI process > > c/C++ example src/snes/examples/tutorials/ex19 run successfully with 2 > MPI process > > Graphics example src/snes/examples/tutorials/ex19 run successfully > with 1 MPI process > > /bin/sh: test: argument expected > make[3]: [ex19.rm] Error 1 (ignored) > /bin/sh: test: argument expected > make[3]: [ex19.rm] Error 1 (ignored) > /bin/sh: test: argument expected > make[3]: [ex19.rm] Error 1 (ignored) > /bin/sh: test: argument expected > make[3]: [ex19.rm] Error 1 (ignored) > Fortran example src/snes/examples/tutorials/ex5f run successfully with > 1 MPI process > /bin/sh: test: argument expected > make[3]: [ex5f.rm] Error 1 (ignored) > /bin/sh: test: argument expected > make[3]: [ex5f.rm] Error 1 (ignored) > /bin/sh: test: argument expected > make[3]: [ex5f.rm] Error 1 (ignored) > /bin/sh: test: argument expected > make[3]: [ex5f.rm] Error 1 (ignored) > Completed test examples > > Is this the correct installation? Why am I getting this error messages? > > Thanks, > > ....Jagruti > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov > [mailto:owner-petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Lisandro Dalcin > Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 12:31 > To: petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov > Subject: Re: Compiled information for Petsc 2.3.2-p10 > > I want to suggest you to update to 2.3.3. Of course, you have the extra > trouble of figuring out yourself the cummulative changes since 2.2.1. > > Go ahead updating to 2.3.3, and I can help you at any point you have trouble. > > > > On 10/9/07, Trivedi, Jagruti CIV 470000D, 474300D <jagruti.trivedi at > navy.mil> wrote: > > > > Do you mean that I should apply changes from 2.2.1 to 2.3.0 and then > > 2.3.1 and so forth until I come upto 2.3.3 version or I can apply > > directly from 2.2.1 to 2.3.3? > > > > ...Jagruti > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov > > [mailto:owner-petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Satish Balay > > Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 11:29 > > To: petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov > > Subject: Re: Compiled information for Petsc 2.3.2-p10 > > > > > > It is possible that we didn't document all the changes between releases. > > > > But the recommended approach is to look at changes file for each > > version after 2.2.1 - and apply these changes. > > > > And if your code is in C - then the compiler will help in finding > > any undocumented changes in prototypes.. etc.. > > > > BTW: the current release version is 2.3.3 [so you might want to > > upgrade to this version instead of 2.3.2] > > > > Satish > > > > On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Trivedi, Jagruti CIV 470000D, 474300D wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hello there, > > > > > > I am trying to port my application from petsc 2.2.1 to petsc > > 2.3.2-p10. > > > Has anybody compiled > > > The real life changes needed to make other than listed in the > > > changes file? > > > > > > I really appreciate if you have hands on do's and don'ts for > > > porting from petsc-2.2.1 to Petsc 2.3.2-p10. > > > > > > Looking forward to positive replies. > > > > > > Thanks and Best Regards, > > > > > > ....Jagruti > > > > > > NAWC > > > > > > > > > > -- > Lisandro Dalc?n > --------------- > Centro Internacional de M?todos Computacionales en Ingenier?a (CIMEC) > Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnol?gico para la Industria Qu?mica (INTEC) > Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient?ficas y T?cnicas (CONICET) > PTLC - G?emes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina > Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594 > > -- Lisandro Dalc?n --------------- Centro Internacional de M?todos Computacionales en Ingenier?a (CIMEC) Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnol?gico para la Industria Qu?mica (INTEC) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient?ficas y T?cnicas (CONICET) PTLC - G?emes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594
