Well, any iterative solver will actually work, but expect a really poor scalability :-). I believe (never used dense matrices) that you could use a direct method (PLAPACK?), but again, be prepared for long running times if your problem is (even moderately) large.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Yujie <recrusader at gmail.com> wrote: > To my knowledge, PETsc doesn't provide parallel dense matrix-based solvers, > such as for CG, GMRES and so on. If it is, how to deal with this problem? > Thanks. > > Regards, > > Yujie > -- Lisandro Dalc?n --------------- Centro Internacional de M?todos Computacionales en Ingenier?a (CIMEC) Instituto de Desarrollo Tecnol?gico para la Industria Qu?mica (INTEC) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cient?ficas y T?cnicas (CONICET) PTLC - G?emes 3450, (3000) Santa Fe, Argentina Tel/Fax: +54-(0)342-451.1594
