.zip files are automatically destroyed by our SPAM blocker. Please send a compressed tar file or something similar to petsc-maint at mcs.anl.gov
On Sep 26, 2008, at 11:31 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote: > Shoot, I am looking through my mail but cannot find it. Can you send > it to petsc-maint? > > Thanks, > > Matt > > On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Etienne PERCHAT > <etienne.perchat at transvalor.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Matt, >> >> I don't understand. I thought that what I've send to you in .zip >> file contained all the required information. >> >> Did you received it ? >> >> I used MatView and VecView within a PetscViewer created with >> PetscViewerASCIIOpen(PETSC_COMM_WORLD, NomVec, &writer); >> Does it contains all the require information or do you need >> something more? >> >> Thanks, >> Etienne >> >> PS: I would like to stress that we are using PetSc since quite a >> long time that it works WONDERFULLY well and that we are fully >> satisfied and really grateful to have the opportunity of using it. >> >> >> >> -----Message d'origine----- >> De : owner-petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov [mailto:owner-petsc-users at >> mcs.anl.gov >> ] De la part de Matthew Knepley >> Envoy? : jeudi 25 septembre 2008 21:06 >> ? : petsc-users at mcs.anl.gov >> Objet : Re: ****MJ-REJECTED**** RE: Non repetability issue and >> difference between 2.3.0 and 2.3.3 >> >> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Etienne PERCHAT >> <etienne.perchat at transvalor.com> wrote: >>> Hi Barry, >>> >>> yes we are in mpich2 1.0.2p1. >> >> As before, we really need to see the system and rhs, or the whole >> code. >> >> Matt >> >> > > > > -- > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which > their experiments lead. > -- Norbert Wiener >
