This is not an efficient parallel operation. You should probably rework your algorithm so that it is not necessary.
Matt On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Umut Tabak <u.tabak at tudelft.nl> wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to set a column of a matrix, I read through the manual > pages a bit... Since the matrices are row oriented in PETSc and > there is a function MatSetValuesRow, I guess transposing my > original matrix and then using this function is the best option I > could see for the moment. Could you comment on this? > > BR, > Umut > -- > Quote: I love the name of honor, more than I fear death. > Author: Julius Caesar 101-44 BC, Roman Emperor > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20091101/bec30776/attachment.htm>
