Luke Bloy wrote: > Thanks for the response. Thats unfortunate as i use many different > types of matrices that i would like use with petsc. > > I'm not much of a c++ whiz, me neither ;) > but i'm curious if something like an adaptor would be possible that > would make a > (float *) behave like a (petscscalar *) as far as petsc was concerned? > Thoughts? I am not sure if these kinds of pointer conversions are safe if you do not know that what 'petscscalar *' really is, you might check the docs.
- [petsc-users] ublas sparse matrix bindings? Luke Bloy
- [petsc-users] ublas sparse matrix bindings? Matthew Knepley
- [petsc-users] ublas sparse matrix bindings? Satish Balay
- [petsc-users] ublas sparse matrix bindings? Luke Bloy
- [petsc-users] ublas sparse matrix bindings? Satish Balay
- [petsc-users] ublas sparse matrix binding... Umut Tabak
- [petsc-users] ublas sparse matrix bi... Luke Bloy
- [petsc-users] ublas sparse matri... Umut Tabak
- [petsc-users] ublas sparse matrix binding... Luke Bloy
- [petsc-users] ublas sparse matrix bi... Umut Tabak
- [petsc-users] ublas sparse matri... Aron Ahmadia
- [petsc-users] ublas sparse m... Luke Bloy
- [petsc-users] ublas sparse m... Matthew Knepley
- [petsc-users] ublas sparse m... Jed Brown
- [petsc-users] ublas sparse m... Matthew Knepley
- [petsc-users] ublas sparse m... Barry Smith
