I don't know. Never used paramesh. Barry
On Nov 18, 2010, at 4:04 AM, TAY wee-beng wrote: > Hi Barry, > > In that case, will it be very difficult to use paramesh together with PETSc? > > I may thinking that as long as I can create a matrix from paramesh and store > it as a PETSc format matrix, everything should be fine when I try to solve > Ax=b. Is it the same for the parallel case too? > > Or is it better if I direct the questions to the paramesh developers? > > Thanks! > > Yours sincerely, > > TAY wee-beng > > > On 17-11-2010 18:28, Barry Smith wrote: >> libmesh has adaptive refinement and all kinds of cool stuff and lives on >> top of PETSc. >> >> Barry >> >> But it is C++. >> >> >> On Nov 17, 2010, at 8:04 AM, TAY wee-beng wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am thinking of adding adaptive mesh refinement to my current fortran >>> code. I am using an immersed boundary code with staggered cartesian grid. I >>> am using PETSc to solve my momentum equations and PETSc/hypre to solve my >>> poisson equation. The code now runs in parallel. >>> >>> Since I'm programming in fortran, some other c++ packages may not be >>> feasible. I am considering packages like paramesh and AGRIF. I wonder if >>> it is possible to integrate them together with PETSc. Is there anything >>> which I need to consider too? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> -- >>> Yours sincerely, >>> >>> TAY wee-beng >>>
