On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Jed Brown <jed at 59a2.org> wrote: >> >> 2- Are there optimized parallel solvers for dense matrices in PETSc ? > > The current implementation uses PLAPACK. > > You might also consider using FMM (see > http://barbagroup.bu.edu/Barba_group/PetFMM.html) since explicit storage of > dense matrices cannot scale.
I am not sure why my case would be explicit storage, even if I use MatCreate and MatSetValues do I still need to be concerned about scalability issues ? thanks, Hamid
