Unfortunately, I am still forced to use version 3.1. I will come back to this issue after the upgrade to 3.2, which should be next week.
Many thanks, Dominik On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 3:28 PM, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > > Dominik, > > This should not happen. Does this happen with petsc-3.2? Note that we > are now supporting PETSc 3.2 and if the problem does not exist in 3.2 we > will not fix it in 3.1. If it exists in 3.2 we will definitely fix it. Can > you send us a small piece of code that exhibits this behavior or point to a > PETSc example that exhibits this behavior so we can reproduce it and fix the > error in 3.2 > > Barry > > We have specific code that prevents the > On Oct 21, 2011, at 4:18 AM, Dominik Szczerba wrote: > > > I am getting this error when performing a series of KSP solves. Removing > "-ksp_monitor_true_residual" from options removes the error, but I would > like to see the residues on screen. > > > > I do not seem to find any functions in the docu to set max number of KSP > monitors, but even if there is one - is it really wasteful to monitor each > solve of my system? > > > > Thanks, > > Dominik > > > > [0]PETSC ERROR: --------------------- Error Message > ------------------------------------ > > [0]PETSC ERROR: Argument out of range! > > [0]PETSC ERROR: Too many KSP monitors set! > > [0]PETSC ERROR: > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > [0]PETSC ERROR: Petsc Release Version 3.1.0, Patch 8, Thu Mar 17 13:37:48 > CDT 2011 > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20111021/16c644f6/attachment.htm>
