On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 08:26, TAY wee-beng <zonexo at gmail.com> wrote:
> However, it seems that there are better ways to do it to get a more > balanced load. Do I use DMDA in PETSc to do it? I'm now using staggered > Cartesian grids for my u,v,p. Is there an example to construct a > Laplace/Poisson equation using DMDA? > src/snes/examples/tutorials/ex5.c (Bratu problem, simple nonlinearity added to Poisson) See also src/snes/examples/tutorials/ex50.c (thermal/lid-driven cavity) > > It is mentioned in the manual that DMMG infrastructure will be replaced in > the next release and we should not use it. Is this related to DMDA? > DMMG used DM (the algebraic interface implemented by DMDA). DMDA is recommended, but don't write new code with DMMG. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20111111/8be70d3c/attachment.htm>
