On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 06:18, Gong Ding <gdiso at ustc.edu> wrote: > In the function of PetscOptionsFindPair_Private (options.c line 1098), > there are still some code with the same problem.
Are you passing a full path to the option? Or just many very long prefixes? This absolutely needs to be fixed, but I think there are a lot of places where fixed-length temporary buffers are used for building options keys and values. I would like to know how you are triggering these overflows so that I can stand a decent chance of getting all of them. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20111203/8dc46702/attachment.htm>
