On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 17:25, Mohammad Mirzadeh <mirzadeh at gmail.com> wrote:
> Just to make sure though, is my assumption on the natural ordering of > PETSc correct? Yes, but please don't write code that depends on that. It's plenty easy to query the local size or the sizes/starts of other processes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20120409/0ad28fbe/attachment.htm>
