Correct! That's what I thought :) On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 12:08, Mohammad Mirzadeh <mirzadeh at gmail.com>wrote: > >> Humm. What I meant by contiguous is in terms of new global numberings. >> That is for proc 0: [0, np0), for proc 1: [np0, np1), for proc 2: [np1, >> np2) ..., for proc p-1: [ np-2, ntotal). I did not mean >> (topologically) contiguous partitions. Is this not the case? >> > > The global numbering produced by ISPartitioningToNumbering() is > contiguous, but each part might not be topologically connected. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20120412/dad1ed86/attachment.htm>
