On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Mohammad Mirzadeh <mirzadeh at gmail.com>wrote:
> > You are not checking error codes, otherwise you wouldn't see all the > subsequent errors. > > That's correct. I don't quite remember, but I think at some point I had > trouble with function returns and CHKERRQ( and also CHKERRV? -- not sure > though) and so I dropped it; is this terrible or just bad? PETSc still > produces errors when I'm not using it so I though I'm ok! > Terrible. Matt > > The default behavior was changed in petsc-dev because forgetting to > preallocate was too common of a mistake > > Thanks. In fact I do preallocate(exactly), it may be that I'm not doing it > right; gotta check. > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20120425/ca811ab2/attachment.htm>
