On 4/5/2012 9:11 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote: > On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:01 PM, TAY wee-beng <zonexo at gmail.com > <mailto:zonexo at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > On 4/5/2012 5:17 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote: >> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 11:05 AM, TAY wee-beng <zonexo at gmail.com >> <mailto:zonexo at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> >> On 4/5/2012 3:05 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote: >>> On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:59 AM, TAY wee-beng >>> <zonexo at gmail.com <mailto:zonexo at gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Is there anything else I can try to get it working right? >>> >>> >>> The MatGetNullSpaceRemove() is missing. >> Where should I add MatGetNullSpaceRemove and what are its >> syntax? I googled but there's no results. >> >> >> Fixed in p;etsc-dev: >> >> >> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-dev/docs/manualpages/Mat/MatNullSpaceRemove.html > > I just compiled the updated petsc-dev but I got the same error msg > when I use: > > call MatNullSpaceRemove(nullspace,b,PETSC_NULL,ierr) > > error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol MATNULLSPACEREMOVE > referenced in function COMPUTERHS > 1>c:\obj_tmp\ex29f\Debug\ex29f.exe : fatal error LNK1120: 1 > unresolved externals > > > That function is in: > > src/mat/interface/ftn-custom/zmatrixf.c > > Did that compile? Can you see the symbol in libpetsc.a? > > Matt
How can I check for the symbol in libpetsc.a? Thanks. > >> Matt >> >> Thanks. >>> >>> Matt >>> >>> Thanks? >>> >>> >>> On 2/5/2012 10:11 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote: >>>> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 1:55 PM, TAY wee-beng >>>> <zonexo at gmail.com <mailto:zonexo at gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I did a MatView and VecView on both C and Fortran, >>>> right after Mat and Vec assembly. I have attached >>>> the printout below. They are exactly the same, but >>>> yet the result is different in Neumann condition. >>>> However, the dirichlet condition gives the correct >>>> ans. Is there anything else that could be wrong >>>> even if the Mat and Vec are the same? >>>> >>>> >>>> Did you set the null space for the matrix when you have >>>> Neumann conditions? >>> Yes, for the matrix, I set as: >>> >>> call >>> >>> MatNullSpaceCreate(PETSC_COMM_WORLD,PETSC_TRUE,0,PETSC_NULL_OBJECT,nullspace,ierr) >>> >>> call MatSetNullSpace(jac,nullspace,ierr) >>> >>> call MatNullSpaceDestroy(nullspace,ierr) >>> >>> for the Vec, >>> >>> call >>> >>> MatNullSpaceCreate(PETSC_COMM_WORLD,PETSC_TRUE,0,PETSC_NULL_OBJECT,nullspace,ierr) >>> >>> *!call MatNullSpaceRemove(nullspace,b,PETSC_NULL,ierr)* >>> >>> call MatNullSpaceDestroy(nullspace,ierr) >>> >>> MatNullSpaceRemove was comment out because there's error >>> during linking >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Matt >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> Fortran: >>>> >>>> Matrix Object: 1 MPI processes >>>> type: seqaij >>>> row 0: (0, 2) (1, -1) (3, -1) >>>> row 1: (0, -1) (1, 3) (2, -1) (4, -1) >>>> row 2: (1, -1) (2, 2) (5, -1) >>>> row 3: (0, -1) (3, 3) (4, -1) (6, -1) >>>> row 4: (1, -1) (3, -1) (4, 4) (5, -1) (7, -1) >>>> row 5: (2, -1) (4, -1) (5, 3) (8, -1) >>>> row 6: (3, -1) (6, 2) (7, -1) >>>> row 7: (4, -1) (6, -1) (7, 3) (8, -1) >>>> row 8: (5, -1) (7, -1) (8, 2) >>>> Vector Object:Vec_0000000084000000_0 1 MPI processes >>>> type: mpi >>>> Process [0] >>>> 0.25 >>>> 0.0205213 >>>> 1.135e-005 >>>> 0.0205213 >>>> 0.00168449 >>>> 9.31663e-007 >>>> 1.135e-005 >>>> 9.31663e-007 >>>> 5.15289e-010 >>>> Vector Object:Vec_0000000084000000_1 1 MPI processes >>>> type: mpi >>>> Process [0] >>>> 0.14924 >>>> 0.0242397 >>>> -0.0260347 >>>> 0.0242397 >>>> -0.0256192 >>>> -0.0400102 >>>> -0.0260347 >>>> -0.0400102 >>>> -0.0400102 >>>> Press any key to continue . . . >>>> >>>> C: >>>> >>>> Matrix Object: 1 MPI processes >>>> type: seqaij >>>> row 0: (0, 2) (1, -1) (3, -1) >>>> row 1: (0, -1) (1, 3) (2, -1) (4, -1) >>>> row 2: (1, -1) (2, 2) (5, -1) >>>> row 3: (0, -1) (3, 3) (4, -1) (6, -1) >>>> row 4: (1, -1) (3, -1) (4, 4) (5, -1) (7, -1) >>>> row 5: (2, -1) (4, -1) (5, 3) (8, -1) >>>> row 6: (3, -1) (6, 2) (7, -1) >>>> row 7: (4, -1) (6, -1) (7, 3) (8, -1) >>>> row 8: (5, -1) (7, -1) (8, 2) >>>> Vector Object:Vec_0x1d3b000_0 1 MPI processes >>>> type: mpi >>>> Process [0] >>>> 0.25 >>>> 0.0205212 >>>> 1.135e-05 >>>> 0.0205212 >>>> 0.00168449 >>>> 9.31663e-07 >>>> 1.135e-05 >>>> 9.31663e-07 >>>> 5.15288e-10 >>>> Vector Object:Vec_0x1d3b000_1 1 MPI processes >>>> type: mpi >>>> Process [0] >>>> 0.139311 >>>> 0.0305751 >>>> -0.0220633 >>>> 0.0305751 >>>> -0.0135158 >>>> -0.042185 >>>> -0.0220633 >>>> -0.042185 >>>> -0.058449 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Yours sincerely, >>>> >>>> TAY wee-beng >>>> >>>> >>>> On 1/5/2012 11:54 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote: >>>>> On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 5:48 PM, TAY wee-beng >>>>> <zonexo at gmail.com <mailto:zonexo at gmail.com>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Do you mean my method is wrong? >>>>> >>>>> I am following the template of ex22f, >>>>> >>>>> where the variables are declared as : >>>>> >>>>> PetscScalar v(5) >>>>> >>>>> MatStencil row(4),col(4,5) >>>>> >>>>> Hence, >>>>> >>>>> for the neumann BC >>>>> >>>>> num = 1 >>>>> >>>>> if (j/=0) then >>>>> >>>>> v(num) = -rho*HxdHy >>>>> >>>>> col(MatStencil_i,num) = i >>>>> >>>>> col(MatStencil_j,num) = j-1 >>>>> >>>>> num = num + 1 >>>>> >>>>> end if >>>>> >>>>> if (i/=0) then >>>>> >>>>> v(num) = -rho*HydHx >>>>> >>>>> col(MatStencil_i,num) = i-1 >>>>> >>>>> col(MatStencil_j,num) = j >>>>> >>>>> num = num + 1 >>>>> >>>>> end if >>>>> >>>>> if (i/=mx-1) then >>>>> >>>>> v(num) = -rho*HydHx >>>>> >>>>> col(MatStencil_i,num) = i+1 >>>>> >>>>> col(MatStencil_j,num) = j >>>>> >>>>> num = num + 1 >>>>> >>>>> end if >>>>> >>>>> if (j/=my-1) then >>>>> >>>>> v(num) = -rho*HxdHy >>>>> >>>>> col(MatStencil_i,num) = i >>>>> >>>>> col(MatStencil_j,num) = j+1 >>>>> >>>>> num = num + 1 >>>>> >>>>> end if >>>>> >>>>> v(num) = >>>>> ((num-1)/2.0)*rho*(HxdHy + HydHx) >>>>> >>>>> print *, v >>>>> >>>>> col(MatStencil_i,num) = i >>>>> >>>>> col(MatStencil_j,num) = j >>>>> >>>>> !num = num + 1 >>>>> >>>>> call >>>>> >>>>> MatSetValuesStencil(jac,i1,row,num,col,v,INSERT_VALUES,ierr) >>>>> >>>>> I do not get any more out of range error. >>>>> However,my ans is still different from that of >>>>> ex29 in C. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This is very simple. You have an error in your >>>>> code. Checking it is very simple: run the code and >>>>> break in MatSetValues(). Make sure ex29 makes >>>>> calls with exactly the same indices as your ex29f. >>>>> >>>>> Matt >>>>> >>>>> Yours sincerely, >>>>> >>>>> TAY wee-beng >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> What most experimenters take for granted before >>>>> they begin their experiments is infinitely more >>>>> interesting than any results to which their >>>>> experiments lead. >>>>> -- Norbert Wiener >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they >>>> begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting >>>> than any results to which their experiments lead. >>>> -- Norbert Wiener >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin >>> their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any >>> results to which their experiments lead. >>> -- Norbert Wiener >> >> >> >> >> -- >> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their >> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to >> which their experiments lead. >> -- Norbert Wiener > > > > > -- > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their > experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which > their experiments lead. > -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20120504/a43ed2fa/attachment-0001.htm>
