On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Andrew Spott <andrew.spott at gmail.com>wrote:
> That is what I figure. > > I'm curious though if you need to manually determine the local row > distribution after you do that. (for example, say you completely remove > all the values from the local range of one processor? that processor > wouldn't be utilized unless you redistribute the matrix) > What sizes and method are we talking about? Usually additional (compact) basis functions only make sense to add to one of a small number of processes. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20120515/a1d9acc1/attachment.htm>
