On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Matthew Knepley <knepley at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think MatGetArray needs to be removed. Pretty much any use of it is >> wrong. It is not even the right thing for dense matrices because they >> should be distributed differently than PETSc does now. >> > Without it, people cannot get directly to the AIJ data structure. No > matter how wrong it is, > it is a constant request. I would keep it in just to satisfy that large > number of petsc-maints. > There can be a MatSeqAIJGetArray() and others. These arrays are all different things so the user should call a different function to make it clear what they are getting. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20120525/a91770c9/attachment.html>
