Hm - if you have a mercurial clone of petsc-dev - you don't need to apply/revert DMDAVecRestoreArrayF90-2.patch. You can just apply DMDAVecRestoreArrayF90-2.1.patch.
But I'm not sure why you are getting errors. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sbalay at ps3 ~/petsc-dev $ hg revert -a sbalay at ps3 ~/petsc-dev $ hg st sbalay at ps3 ~/petsc-dev $ patch -Np1 < ~/DMDAVecRestoreArrayF90-2.1.patch (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) patching file src/dm/impls/da/f90-custom/zda1f90.c (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) patching file src/sys/f90-src/f90_cwrap.c (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) patching file src/sys/f90-src/fsrc/f90_fwrap.F sbalay at ps3 ~/petsc-dev $ hg st M src/dm/impls/da/f90-custom/zda1f90.c M src/sys/f90-src/f90_cwrap.c M src/sys/f90-src/fsrc/f90_fwrap.F sbalay at ps3 ~/petsc-dev $ <<<<<<<<<<<< Satish On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, TAY wee-beng wrote: > > On 11/7/2012 5:12 PM, Satish Balay wrote: > > You would revert the old one - and apply the new one. i.e > > > > patch -Np1 -R< DMDAVecRestoreArrayF90-2.patch > > patch -Np1< DMDAVecRestoreArrayF90-2.1.patch > > > > Satish > > Hi, > > Just tried but I still get the error: > > $ !494 > patch -p1 < DMDAVecRestoreArrayF90-2.patch > (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) > patching file src/dm/impls/da/f90-custom/zda1f90.c > (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) > patching file src/sys/f90-src/f90_cwrap.c > (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) > patching file src/sys/f90-src/fsrc/f90_fwrap.F > > User at windows-480c6c3 /cygdrive/c/Codes/petsc-dev > $ !498 > patch -Np1 -R < DMDAVecRestoreArrayF90-2.patch > (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) > patching file src/dm/impls/da/f90-custom/zda1f90.c > (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) > patching file src/sys/f90-src/f90_cwrap.c > (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) > patching file src/sys/f90-src/fsrc/f90_fwrap.F > > User at windows-480c6c3 /cygdrive/c/Codes/petsc-dev > $ !500 > patch -Np1 < DMDAVecRestoreArrayF90-2.1.patch > (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) > patching file src/dm/impls/da/f90-custom/zda1f90.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 175. > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file > src/dm/impls/da/f90-custom/zda1f90.c.rej > (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) > patching file src/sys/f90-src/f90_cwrap.c > Hunk #1 FAILED at 307. > Hunk #2 FAILED at 333. > Hunk #3 FAILED at 436. > 3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file > src/sys/f90-src/f90_cwrap.c.rej > (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) > patching file src/sys/f90-src/fsrc/f90_fwrap.F > Hunk #1 FAILED at 322. > Hunk #2 FAILED at 426. > 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file > src/sys/f90-src/fsrc/f90_fwrap.F.rej > > > > > On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, TAY wee-beng wrote: > > > > > > > > On 11/7/2012 3:40 PM, Satish Balay wrote: > > > > The second patch has typos. Attaching the modified patch. If it works > > > > for > > > > you - I'll add it to petsc-3.3/petsc-dev > > > > > > > > thanks, > > > > Satish > > > Hi, > > > > > > How should I apply the patch? I download a new petsc-dev and used: > > > > > > /patch -p1< DMDAVecRestoreArrayF90-2.1.patch > > > / > > > It says: > > > > > > /(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) > > > patching file src/dm/impls/da/f90-custom/zda1f90.c > > > Hunk #1 FAILED at 175. > > > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file > > > src/dm/impls/da/f90-custom/zda1f90.c.rej > > > (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) > > > patching file src/sys/f90-src/f90_cwrap.c > > > Hunk #1 FAILED at 307. > > > Hunk #2 FAILED at 333. > > > Hunk #3 FAILED at 436. > > > 3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file > > > src/sys/f90-src/f90_cwrap.c.rej > > > (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) > > > patching file src/sys/f90-src/fsrc/f90_fwrap.F > > > Hunk #1 FAILED at 322. > > > Hunk #2 FAILED at 426. > > > 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file > > > src/sys/f90-src/fsrc/f90_fwrap.F.rej/ > > > > > > I also used : > > > > > > /patch -p1 DMDAVecRestoreArrayF90-2.patch > > > patch -p1 DMDAVecRestoreArrayF90-2.1.patch > > > > > > $ patch -p1< DMDAVecRestoreArrayF90-2.patch > > > (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) > > > patching file src/dm/impls/da/f90-custom/zda1f90.c > > > (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) > > > patching file src/sys/f90-src/f90_cwrap.c > > > (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) > > > patching file src/sys/f90-src/fsrc/f90_fwrap.F > > > / > > > / > > > $ patch -p1< DMDAVecRestoreArrayF90-2.1.patch > > > (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) > > > patching file src/dm/impls/da/f90-custom/zda1f90.c > > > Hunk #1 FAILED at 175. > > > 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file > > > src/dm/impls/da/f90-custom/zda1f90.c.rej > > > (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) > > > patching file src/sys/f90-src/f90_cwrap.c > > > Hunk #1 FAILED at 307. > > > Hunk #2 FAILED at 333. > > > Hunk #3 FAILED at 436. > > > 3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file > > > src/sys/f90-src/f90_cwrap.c.rej > > > (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) > > > patching file src/sys/f90-src/fsrc/f90_fwrap.F > > > Hunk #1 FAILED at 322. > > > Hunk #2 FAILED at 426. > > > 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file > > > src/sys/f90-src/fsrc/f90_fwrap.F.rej/ > > > > > > Lastly, using patch -p1< DMDAVecRestoreArrayF90.patch gives: > > > / > > > $ patch -p1< DMDAVecRestoreArrayF90.patch > > > (Stripping trailing CRs from patch.) > > > patching file src/dm/impls/da/f90-custom/zda1f90.c > > > Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] n > > > Apply anyway? [n] n > > > Skipping patch. > > > 4 out of 4 hunks ignored -- saving rejects to file > > > src/dm/impls/da/f90-custom/zda1f90.c.rej/ > > > > On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, TAY wee-beng wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 6/7/2012 5:48 PM, Barry Smith wrote: > > > > > > Blaise, > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > Satish, > > > > > > > > > > > > If they look good could you apply them to 3.3 and dev? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > Barry > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I downloaded petsc-dev a few days ago and applied both patches using > > > > > "patch -v > > > > > ..." in both linux and windows vs2008 > > > > > > > > > > It worked great in linux > > > > > > > > > > However, when I compile and link in vs2008, it gives the error: > > > > > / > > > > > 1>Compiling manifest to resources... > > > > > 1>Microsoft (R) Windows (R) Resource Compiler Version 6.1.6723.1 > > > > > 1>Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. > > > > > 1>Linking... > > > > > 1>libpetsc.lib(f90_cwrap.o) : error LNK2019: unresolved external > > > > > symbol > > > > > F90ARRAY4dCREATESCALAR referenced in function F90Array4dCreate > > > > > 1>libpetsc.lib(f90_cwrap.o) : error LNK2019: unresolved external > > > > > symbol > > > > > F90ARRAY4dACCESSFORTRANADDR referenced in function F90Array4dAccess > > > > > 1>libpetsc.lib(f90_cwrap.o) : error LNK2019: unresolved external > > > > > symbol > > > > > F90ARRAY4dACCESSINT referenced in function F90Array4dAccess > > > > > 1>libpetsc.lib(f90_cwrap.o) : error LNK2019: unresolved external > > > > > symbol > > > > > F90ARRAY4dACCESSREAL referenced in function F90Array4dAccess > > > > > 1>libpetsc.lib(f90_cwrap.o) : error LNK2019: unresolved external > > > > > symbol > > > > > F90ARRAY4dACCESSSCALAR referenced in function F90Array4dAccess > > > > > 1>libpetsc.lib(f90_cwrap.o) : error LNK2019: unresolved external > > > > > symbol > > > > > F90ARRAY4dDESTROYSCALAR referenced in function F90Array4dDestroy > > > > > 1>c:\obj_tmp\ibm2d_high_Re_staggered_old\Debug/ibm2d_high_Re_staggered.exe > > > > > : > > > > > fatal error LNK1120: 6 unresolved externals/ > > > > > > > > > > I wonder if it's fixed in the new petsc-dev. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > On Jul 6, 2012, at 6:30 AM, Blaise Bourdin wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have added the creation, destruction and accessor functions for > > > > > > > 4d > > > > > > > vectors in F90. The accessor was missing and needed for > > > > > > > DMDAVecGetArrayF90 > > > > > > > with a 3d DMDA and>1 dof. As far as I can test, ex11f90 in DM > > > > > > > should > > > > > > > now > > > > > > > completely work with the intel compilers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Some of the functions are probably not used (F90Array4dAccessReal, > > > > > > > F90Array4dAccessInt, F90Array4dAccessFortranAddr, for instance), > > > > > > > but I > > > > > > > added them anyway. Let me know if you want me to submit a patch > > > > > > > without > > > > > > > them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blaise > > > > > > > <DMDAVecRestoreArrayF90-2.patch> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > Department of Mathematics and Center for Computation& Technology > > > > > > > Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA > > > > > > > Tel. +1 (225) 578 1612, Fax +1 (225) 578 4276 > > > > > > > http://www.math.lsu.edu/~bourdin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
