> They'll be okay as _static_ class functions. I wasn't aware that va_list > doesn't work properly from a member function, but it does modify the calling > sequence.
Indeed. The problem was that the functions had to be virtual, so no static possible in C++. > It could be compiler-dependent. C++ is not my favorite language. I am really curious, what is your favorite language? > PetscSynchronizedVFPrintf is missing, but should be added. > (...) > There is actually an implementation issue. It is possible that I will have to resolve it (by contributing code), and therefore I may soon come back for some more pointers. Regards, Dominik
