Am 08.12.2012 15:37, schrieb Jed Brown: > How about MatPermute() in a suitable place? Not really. I thing, I will try to solve the problem differently and avoid this matrix construction.
Thomas > > I don't know why you would need such a thing. > > On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 6:33 AM, Thomas Witkowski > <thomas.witkowski at tu-dresden.de > <mailto:thomas.witkowski at tu-dresden.de>> wrote: > > I checked the documentation of MatGetSubMatrix() and found the > following: > > "The rows in isrow will be sorted into the same order as the > original matrix on each process." > > For my case, this will be wrong. I need to say each task exactly > which row from the old matrix should be which row in the new > matrix. Any other possibility to do this? > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20121208/c28efa1d/attachment.html>
