Thank you Barry for your suggestions.

The error I get is now KSP_DIVERGED_INDEFINITE_PC. The matrix that I try
to invert is actually symmetric and positive definite. I was not aware
that this can lead to a indefinite preconditioner.
If I use a Jacobi preconditioner or tell BoomerAMG that the matrix is
symmetric I don't encounter any errors. So I'm quite for now :-)

Daniel
>   Daniel,
>
>      That message is not coming from PETSc so likely Deal.II is processing 
> the result from KSPConvergedReason() and generating that less then totally 
> useful output. If you run with -ksp_converged_reason PETSC will (if Deal.II 
> processes PETSc options correctly) print a more complete reason.
>
>     Off hand I am guessing that CG detected a non-symmetric or indefinite 
> matrix or preconditioner which it cannot handle so it barfed out. You can run 
> with GMRES instead of CG and if that converges then this is the likely 
> explanation.
>
>     Barry
>
>
> On Dec 11, 2012, at 8:19 AM, Daniel Arndt <daniel.arndt at 
> stud.uni-goettingen.de 
> <https://lists.mcs.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/petsc-users>> wrote:
>
> >/ Hello everyone,
> />/ 
> />/ at the moment I'm trying to solve a Poisson problem with SIPG
> />/ stabilization and discontinuous finite elements. The matrix is
> />/ constructed in deal.II. When I try to solve this problem with PETSc's CG
> />/ solver and a BlockJacobi preconditioner or a BoomerAMG preconditioner
> />/ from the Hypre package I get this weird error message.
> />/ 
> />/ Exception on processing:
> />/ Iterative method reported convergence failure in step 3 with residual
> />/ 1.50616
> />/ Aborting!
> />/ 
> />/ Since the solver is allowed to take 5000 steps this convergence failure
> />/ is clearly early. Did anyone encounter such an error before? What can
> />/ produce such an early convergence failure?
> />/ 
> />/ Thanks in advance,
> />/ Daniel
> />/ 
> />/ 
> />/ 
> /
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20121211/acf178bc/attachment.html>

Reply via email to