On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Umut Tabak <u.tabak at tudelft.nl> wrote:
> On 01/01/2013 04:36 PM, Jed Brown wrote: > > Nope, it saves all matrices the same way because the binary format is not > smart enough to distinguish different formats on disk. > > ok, while saving there is no dense matrix concept basically... > Only if you do it manually. I recommend 1. Just use sparse and don't worry about it. 2. If you feel (1) is such a crucial performance bottleneck that must be sped up by a small fraction, change your workflow to avoid writing such large matrices to disk, thus speeding up this phase by orders of magnitude. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20130101/b4187fc1/attachment.html>
