Should I just grab the "tip"? On Mar 6, 2013, at 10:42 AM, Jed Brown <jedbrown at mcs.anl.gov> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Manav Bhatia <bhatiamanav at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Jed. > > 3.3 compiles fine on my machine with complex support. However, the reason I > am not using it is the modified NaN handling between 3.1 and 3.3. > Seems like for a vector with some NaNs 3.1 returned an L2 norm as a NaN. But, > 3.3 throws an exception. I would prefer to handle the NaN occurrence within > my code, which is still forcing me to stick to 3.1. > > Is there a way to turn off this behavior in 3.3? Any other suggestions would > be welcome. > > Use petsc-3.3 from here. > > https://bitbucket.org/petsc/petsc-3.3 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20130306/c9fac2d8/attachment.html>
