On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Dharmendar Reddy <dharmareddy84 at gmail.com>wrote:
> Hello, > If a petsc function XXX has no corresponding XXXF90, then where > ever, say, PetscScalar values[] is expected, one should pass > > PetscScalar, pointer :: values(:) > > not > PetscScalar, allocatable :: values(:) > > Right ? > No, if its not F90, then it uses F77-style arrays. > Can i request for VecSetValuesSectionF90 ? > Added. Matt > Thanks > Reddy > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------- > Dharmendar Reddy Palle > Graduate Student > Microelectronics Research center, > University of Texas at Austin, > 10100 Burnet Road, Bldg. 160 > MER 2.608F, TX 78758-4445 > e-mail: dharmareddy84 at gmail.com > Phone: +1-512-350-9082 > United States of America. > Homepage: https://webspace.utexas.edu/~dpr342 > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-users/attachments/20130412/73c2412e/attachment.html>
