On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 4:31 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > ****** > > Hello,**** > > ** ** > > Would it be possible to build PETSc so that the flag -no_signal_handler > does not have to specified at run time? Or is there a PETSc subroutine that > can be called to implement the -no_signal_handler feature? >
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-current/docs/manualpages/Sys/PetscPopSignalHandler.html Matt > > > Many thanks,**** > > ** ** > > *--------------------------***** > > *Wadud Miah* > *HPC, Design and Theoretical Physics** > *Direct: 0118 98 56220 > AWE, Aldermaston, ****Reading**, ** RG7 4PR******** > > **** > > ** ** > > ___________________________________________________ > ____________________________ The information in this email and in any > attachment(s) is commercial in confidence. If you are not the named > addressee(s) or if you receive this email in error then any distribution, > copying or use of this communication or the information in it is strictly > prohibited. Please notify us immediately by email at admin.internet(at) > awe.co.uk, and then delete this message from your computer. While > attachments are virus checked, AWE plc does not accept any liability in > respect of any virus which is not detected. AWE Plc Registered in England > and Wales Registration No 02763902 AWE, Aldermaston, Reading, RG7 4PR > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener
