On 25/10/13 18:59, Matthew Knepley wrote:
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Hi!

    I'm using PETSc 3.4.3, with only default runtime settings, to
    solve Ax=b, for complex numbers (I have used
    --with-scalar-type=complex).

    After reading sections 4.3.1, 4.3.2, 4.3.3 in the manual, I
    decided to investigate the convergence in my program, since I'm
    having some problems when the system is larger. So, I'm running it
    with the options

    -ksp_monitor_true_residual -ksp_converged_reason -ksp_view

    The output shows that the relative tolerance required for
    convergence is 1e-5, but none of the reported norms are that
    small. Despite this, convergence is reported (CONVERGED_RTOL).

    I though that CONVERGED_RTOL should indicate that ||r||_2/||b||_2
    < 1e-5, where r is the preconditioned residual?

    Here is the output of my program (which includes some code to
    compute the l_2 norm of b, just before KSPSolve is run):

    *************************************************************
    Norm of b: 0.179829
      0 KSP preconditioned resid norm 2.508789303280e+04 true resid
    norm 1.798290175843e-01 ||r(i)||/||b|| 1.000000000000e+00
      1 KSP preconditioned resid norm 1.856991132478e+00 true resid
    norm 3.186462510386e-01 ||r(i)||/||b|| 1.771940120227e+00
      2 KSP preconditioned resid norm 1.704678606994e-01 true resid
    norm 4.004071321891e-02 ||r(i)||/||b|| 2.226599119363e-01


So the relative preconditioned residual is:

  1.7e-01 / 2.5e+04 < 1.0e-5

while the relative true residual is 2.2e-1. This happens because you are using ILU(0). It can be really crappy, and in this case the preconditioner is very ill-conditioned. I can't imagine a problem where I would recommend using ILU, but its our default because its the only black-box PC that exists.

  Thanks

     Matt


From your explanation I can see that I had misunderstood the meaning of "relative preconditioned residual norm", but now I understand. Thanks for clearing it up!

Best regards
Torquil Sørensen

Reply via email to