On May 2, 2014, at 11:36 AM, Anush Krishnan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 1 May 2014 18:25, Anton Popov <[email protected]> wrote: > On 5/1/14 10:39 PM, Anush Krishnan wrote: >> Hi Anton, >> >> On 29 April 2014 05:14, Anton Popov <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> You can do the whole thing much easier (to my opinion). >> Since you created two DMDA anyway, just do: >> >> - find first index on every processor using MPI_Scan >> - create two global vectors (no ghosts) >> - put proper global indicies to global vectors >> - create two local vectors (with ghosts) and set ALL entries to -1 (to have >> what you need in boundary ghosts) >> - call global-to-local scatter >> >> Done! >> >> Won't the vectors contain floating point values? Are you storing your >> indices as real numbers? > YES, exactly. And then I cast them to PetscInt when I compose stencils. > > Something like this: > idx[0] = (PetscInt) ivx[k][j][i]; > idx[1] = (PetscInt) ivx[k][j][i+1]; > idx[2] = (PetscInt) ivy[k][j][i]; > ... and so on, where ivx, ivy, ... are the index arrays in x, y .. > directions > > Then I insert (actually add) stencils using MatSetValues. > > By the way, you can ideally preallocate in parallel with > MatMPIAIJSetPreallocation. To count precisely number entries in the diagonal > & off-diagonal blocks use the same mechanism to easily access global indices, > and then compare them with the local row range, which is also known: > - within the range -> d_nnz[i]++; > - outside the range -> o_nnz[i]++; > > Thanks a lot for the help. I did exactly that and it worked perfectly. > > But just to clarify: if I was using 32-bit floats, would I start having > trouble when my matrix size reaches ~10 million due to the floating point > precision?
If you ./configure PETSc with —with-64-bit-indices=1 then PetscInt will not fit in a float and the code will not work. As soon as you switch you 64 bit indices you would need to use doubles if you hope to store PetscInt in them. Barry > > > Anton > >> >> >> The advantage is that you can access global indices (including ghosts) in >> every block using i-j-k indexing scheme. >> I personally find this way quite easy to implement with PETSc >> >> Anton >> >> Thank you, >> Anush > >
