Wen Jiang <[email protected]> writes: > Thanks for this information. Could you tell me an efficient way to do this > in PETSc? I am planning to use at least 32 threads and need to minimize the > synchronization overhead Any suggestions?
You're probably better off using more MPI processes. Perhaps surprisingly given the hype, pure MPI remains the fastest option in many cases. And always profile the simplest method.
pgpZp5lqClP3x.pgp
Description: PGP signature
