Barry Smith <[email protected]> writes: > We should change this to use a PetscViewerFormat instead of special > casing it.
It's not really a "format", but it would be nice to have a common way to address other viewer implementations. >> PETSc devs, do you suppose MPI-IO support is stable enough that we could >> make this a default? > > It is not so much a question of stability, it is more a question > of (I believe) MPI IO is just loads slower for what might normal > PETSc users use, it only pays off for large numbers of nodes. Do we have current data demonstrating that this is still the case? It's really a failure of the implementations if they can't fall back to the dumbest mechanism when it's faster.
pgpkW1KhqBrKs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
