Satish Balay <[email protected]> writes: > On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Dominic Meiser wrote: > >> On 08/29/2014 08:31 AM, Matthew Knepley wrote: >> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Dominic Meiser <[email protected] >> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> > > Dominic, I think that thrust.py should depend on cuda.py. Do you >> > > know why it does not? >> > In principle you are right, thrust.py should depend on cuda.py. >> > >> > However, in my opinion, thrust.py should go away as a separate >> > package altogether. Thrust is shipped as part of any recent >> > version of the cuda toolkit (I forget since which version, Paul >> > might know) and it's always installed in >> > $CUDA_TOOLKIT_ROOT/include/thrust. Thus we can automatically >> > deduct the thrust location from the cuda location. Thrust should >> > be considered part of cuda. > > I also think it should be removed.
Agreed. If it was correct to consolidate umfpack, cholmod, etc., into suitesparse, then there is no question that thrust should be consolidated into cuda.
pgpkKHcXtGcUR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
