Dear sir:
I think we might following the history trend, forgot fortran77.
We are facing HPC computation,so HPC fortran is out choice.
Regard
At 2016-08-27 10:54:14, "Barry Smith" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> PETSc users,
>
> We've always been very conservative in PETSc to keep almost all our
> Fortran examples in a format that works with classic FORTRAN 77 constructs:
> fixed line format, (72 character limit) and no use of ; to separate
> operations on the same line, etc.
>
> Is it time to forgo these constructs and use more modern Fortran
> conventions in all our examples?
>
> Any feedback is appreciated
>
> Barry
>
>Note: it would continue to be possible to use PETSc in the FORTRAN 77 style,
>this is just a question about updating the examples.
>
>
