Thanks!

Bboth filename and #defines are ok now.

Eric



Le 2016-12-31 à 16:18, Xiaoye S. Li a écrit :
I just updated version string in git repo and tarball.

Sherry

On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Satish Balay <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

    Ok - one more place superlu_dist stores version number - that
    needs updating with every release.

    cc:ing Sherry

    Satish

    On Sat, 31 Dec 2016, Eric Chamberland wrote:

    > I think there is definitly a problem.
    >
    > After looking at the files installed either from petsc-master
    tarball or the
    > manual configure I just did with
    --download-superlu_dist-commit=v5.1.3, the
    > file include/superlu_defs.h have these values:
    >
    > #define SUPERLU_DIST_MAJOR_VERSION     5
    > #define SUPERLU_DIST_MINOR_VERSION     1
    > #define SUPERLU_DIST_PATCH_VERSION     0
    >
    > What's wrong?
    >
    > Eric
    >
    >
    > Le 2016-12-31 à 13:26, Eric Chamberland a écrit :
    > > Ah ok, I see!  Here look at the file name in the configure.log:
    > >
    > > Install the project...
    > > /usr/bin/cmake -P cmake_install.cmake
    > > -- Install configuration: "DEBUG"
    > > -- Installing:
    /opt/petsc-master_debug/lib/libsuperlu_dist.so.5.1.0
    > > -- Installing: /opt/petsc-master_debug/lib/libsuperlu_dist.so.5
    > >
    > > It is saying 5.1.0, but in fact you are right: it is 5.1.3 that is
    > > downloaded!!! :)
    > >
    > > And FWIW, the nighlty automatic compilation of PETSc starts
    within a brand
    > > new and empty directory each night...
    > >
    > > Thanks to both of you again! :)
    > >
    > > Eric
    > >
    > >
    > > Le 2016-12-31 à 13:17, Satish Balay a écrit :
    > > >
    
===============================================================================
    > > >                            Trying to download
    > > > git://https://github.com/xiaoyeli/superlu_dist
    <https://github.com/xiaoyeli/superlu_dist> for SUPERLU_DIST
    > > >
    
===============================================================================
    > > > Executing: git clone
    > > > https://github.com/xiaoyeli/superlu_dist
    <https://github.com/xiaoyeli/superlu_dist>
    > > >
    
/pmi/cmpbib/compilation_BIB_gcc_redhat_petsc-master_debug/COMPILE_AUTO/petsc-master-debug/arch-linux2-c-debug/externalpackages/git.superlu_dist
    > > > stdout: Cloning into
    > > >
    
'/pmi/cmpbib/compilation_BIB_gcc_redhat_petsc-master_debug/COMPILE_AUTO/petsc-master-debug/arch-linux2-c-debug/externalpackages/git.superlu_dist'...
    > > >                      Looking for SUPERLU_DIST at
    git.superlu_dist,
    > > > hg.superlu_dist or a directory starting with ['superlu_dist']
    > > >                      Found a copy of SUPERLU_DIST in
    git.superlu_dist
    > > > Executing: ['git', 'rev-parse', '--git-dir']
    > > > stdout: .git
    > > > Executing: ['git', 'cat-file', '-e', 'v5.1.3^{commit}']
    > > > Executing: ['git', 'rev-parse', 'v5.1.3']
    > > > stdout: 7306f704c6c8d5113def649b76def3c8eb607690
    > > > Executing: ['git', 'stash']
    > > > stdout: No local changes to save
    > > > Executing: ['git', 'clean', '-f', '-d', '-x']
    > > > Executing: ['git', 'checkout', '-f',
    > > > '7306f704c6c8d5113def649b76def3c8eb607690']
    > > > <<<<<<<<
    > > >
    > > > Per log below - its using 5.1.3. Why did you think you got
    5.1.0?
    > > >
    > > > Satish
    > > >
    > > > On Sat, 31 Dec 2016, Eric Chamberland wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > Hi,
    > > > >
    > > > > ok I will test with 5.1.3 with the option you gave me
    > > > > (--download-superlu_dit-commit=v5.1.3).
    > > > >
    > > > > But from what you and Matthew said, I should have 5.1.3 with
    > > > > petsc-master, but
    > > > > the last night log shows me library file name 5.1.0:
    > > > >
    > > > >
    
http://www.giref.ulaval.ca/~cmpgiref/petsc-master-debug/2016.12.31.02h00m01s_configure.log
    
<http://www.giref.ulaval.ca/%7Ecmpgiref/petsc-master-debug/2016.12.31.02h00m01s_configure.log>
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > So I am a bit confused: Why did I got 5.1.0 last night? (I
    use the
    > > > > petsc-master tarball, is it the reason?)
    > > > >
    > > > > Thanks,
    > > > >
    > > > > Eric
    > > > >
    > > > >
    > > > > Le 2016-12-31 à 11:52, Satish Balay a écrit :
    > > > > > On Sat, 31 Dec 2016, Eric Chamberland wrote:
    > > > > >
    > > > > > > Hi,
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > I am just starting to debug a bug encountered with and
    only with
    > > > > > > SuperLU_Dist
    > > > > > > combined with MKL on a 2 processes validation test.
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > (the same test works fine with MUMPS on 2 processes).
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > I just noticed that the SuperLU_Dist version installed
    by PETSc
    > > > > > > configure
    > > > > > > script is 5.1.0 and the latest SuperLU_DIST is 5.1.3.
    > > > > > If you use petsc-master - it will install 5.1.3 by default.
    > > > > > > Before going further, I just want to ask:
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > Is there any specific reason to stick to 5.1.0?
    > > > > > We don't usually upgrade externalpackage version in
    PETSc releases
    > > > > > [unless its tested to work and fixes known bugs]. There
    could be API
    > > > > > changes - or build changes that can potentially conflict.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > >From what I know - 5.1.3 should work with petsc-3.7 [it
    fixes a
    > > > > > couple of
    > > > > > bugs].
    > > > > >
    > > > > > You might be able to do the following with petsc-3.7
    [with git
    > > > > > externalpackage repos]
    > > > > >
    > > > > > --download-superlu_dist --download-superlu_dit-commit=v5.1.3
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Satish
    > > > > >
    > > > > > > Here is some more information:
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > On process 2 I have this printed in stdout:
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > Intel MKL ERROR: Parameter 6 was incorrect on entry to
    DTRSM .
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > and in stderr:
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > Test.ProblemeEFGen.opt: malloc.c:2369: sysmalloc:
    Assertion
    > > > > > > `(old_top ==
    > > > > > > (((mbinptr) (((char *) &((av)->bins[((1) - 1) * 2])) -
    > > > > > > __builtin_offsetof
    > > > > > > (struct malloc_chunk, fd)))) && old_size == 0) ||
    ((unsigned long)
    > > > > > > (old_size)
    > > > > > > > = (unsigned long)((((__builtin_offsetof (struct
    malloc_chunk,
    > > > > > > fd_nextsize))+((2 *(sizeof(size_t))) - 1)) & ~((2
    *(sizeof(size_t)))
    > > > > > > -
    > > > > > > 1))) &&
    > > > > > > ((old_top)->size & 0x1) && ((unsigned long) old_end &
    pagemask) ==
    > > > > > > 0)'
    > > > > > > failed.
    > > > > > > [saruman:15771] *** Process received signal ***
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > This is the 7th call to KSPSolve in the same
    execution. Here is the
    > > > > > > last
    > > > > > > KSPView:
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > KSP Object:(o_slin) 2 MPI processes
    > > > > > >     type: preonly
    > > > > > >     maximum iterations=10000, initial guess is zero
    > > > > > >     tolerances: relative=1e-05, absolute=1e-50,
    divergence=10000.
    > > > > > >     left preconditioning
    > > > > > >     using NONE norm type for convergence test
    > > > > > > PC Object:(o_slin) 2 MPI processes
    > > > > > >     type: lu
    > > > > > >       LU: out-of-place factorization
    > > > > > >       tolerance for zero pivot 2.22045e-14
    > > > > > >       matrix ordering: natural
    > > > > > >       factor fill ratio given 0., needed 0.
    > > > > > >         Factored matrix follows:
    > > > > > >           Mat Object:    2 MPI processes
    > > > > > >             type: mpiaij
    > > > > > >             rows=382, cols=382
    > > > > > >             package used to perform factorization:
    superlu_dist
    > > > > > >             total: nonzeros=0, allocated nonzeros=0
    > > > > > >             total number of mallocs used during
    MatSetValues calls
    > > > > > >             =0
    > > > > > >               SuperLU_DIST run parameters:
    > > > > > >                 Process grid nprow 2 x npcol 1
    > > > > > >  Equilibrate matrix TRUE
    > > > > > >                 Matrix input mode 1
    > > > > > >                 Replace tiny pivots FALSE
    > > > > > >                 Use iterative refinement FALSE
    > > > > > >                 Processors in row 2 col partition 1
    > > > > > >                 Row permutation LargeDiag
    > > > > > >                 Column permutation METIS_AT_PLUS_A
    > > > > > >                 Parallel symbolic factorization FALSE
    > > > > > >                 Repeated factorization SamePattern
    > > > > > >     linear system matrix = precond matrix:
    > > > > > >     Mat Object:  (o_slin)  2 MPI processes
    > > > > > >       type: mpiaij
    > > > > > >       rows=382, cols=382
    > > > > > >       total: nonzeros=4458, allocated nonzeros=4458
    > > > > > >       total number of mallocs used during MatSetValues
    calls =0
    > > > > > >         using I-node (on process 0) routines: found
    109 nodes, limit
    > > > > > > used
    > > > > > >         is 5
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > I know this information is not enough to help debug,
    but I would
    > > > > > > like to
    > > > > > > know
    > > > > > > if PETSc guys will upgrade to 5.1.3 before trying to
    debug anything.
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > > Thanks,
    > > > > > > Eric
    > > > > > >
    > > > > > >
    > > > >
    >
    >
    >



Reply via email to