Satish Balay <[email protected]> writes: > I tried looking at it - but it was easier for me to fixup current ctable code.
I mentioned it more as a long-term thing. I don't think we need two different hashtable implementations in PETSc. I think khash is better and extensible, so we may as well use it in all new code and migrate petsctable to it when convenient. I don't think it's urgent unless someone has a use case that needs it.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
