> On Mar 27, 2017, at 12:56 PM, Amneet Bhalla <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> wrote: > 1) sounds easier and matches your current code. > > Great! > > For matrix free TS, the form of F(t,u,u_t) = rho u*_t - div ( sigma) as > written "on paper" and should not > contain time stepping factors like (1/2) that comes from CN? Similarly for > RHS = G(t,u). What about Jacobian of F (MATSHELL > to solve momentum eqn) --- should that contain these factors?
None of the functions should contain factors associated with a particular time-stepping scheme. Barry > > > -- > --Amneet > > >
