Thanks for the clarification. > On Jul 9, 2017, at 7:05 AM, Mark Adams <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > What are the differences between gamg and mg with -pc_mg_galerkin option > (apart from the default smoother/coarse grid solver options, which I > identified by comparing the ksp_view output)? Perhaps there’s an issue with > the restriction, as you suggest? > > > Not sure if this got answered. GAMG is for unstructured problems. A "pure" > AMG method. > > mg with -pc_mg_galerkin is semi-AMG, it still has geometric interpolation, > and it is generally better if you can use it.
- Re: [petsc-users] Issue using multi-grid as a pre-conditio... Matthew Knepley
- Re: [petsc-users] Issue using multi-grid as a pre-con... Mark Adams
- Re: [petsc-users] Issue using multi-grid as a pre-con... Barry Smith
- Re: [petsc-users] Issue using multi-grid as a pre-con... Jason Lefley
- Re: [petsc-users] Issue using multi-grid as a pre... Matthew Knepley
- Re: [petsc-users] Issue using multi-grid as a... Jason Lefley
- Re: [petsc-users] Issue using multi-grid ... Matthew Knepley
- Re: [petsc-users] Issue using multi-grid ... Jed Brown
- Re: [petsc-users] Issue using multi-grid ... Barry Smith
- Re: [petsc-users] Issue using multi-grid as a pre-con... Mark Adams
- Re: [petsc-users] Issue using multi-grid as a pre... Jason Lefley
