?Thanks Matt! ________________________________ From: Matthew Knepley <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, August 8, 2017 6:49 AM To: Justin Pogacnik Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [petsc-users] [FORGED] Re: NULL section fortran
On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Justin Pogacnik <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Any word on this? Thanks again! Should be in master. Thanks, Matt -Justin ________________________________________ From: Justin Pogacnik Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 8:38 AM To: Barry Smith Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: Re: [FORGED] Re: [petsc-users] NULL section fortran Thanks for the response Barry. Matt, is this something that will be pushed out soon(ish)? Thanks guys! Justin ________________________________________ From: Barry Smith <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 7:59 AM To: Justin Pogacnik Cc: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [FORGED] Re: [petsc-users] NULL section fortran Matt needs to add something like PetscSection, parameter :: PETSC_NULL_SECTION = tPetscSection(-1) PetscSectionSym, parameter :: PETSC_NULL_SECTIONSYM = tPetscSectionSym(-1) to src/vec/f90-mod/petscis.h in the master branch. Barry > On Jul 12, 2017, at 2:52 PM, Justin Pogacnik > <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm assembling a global finite element stiffness matrix and using the > DMPlexMatSetClosure command in fortran. Long ago, in the past, I've used to > set the section input parameters to PETSC_NULL_OBJECT. That now returns an > error -- no implicit type -- during compilation. Looking at the defined null > objects for fortran I don't see a section option. What should I use to invoke > the default sections? > > Hope this makes sense. Thanks! > > Justin -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/
