On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Wenbo Zhao <zhaowenbo.n...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Matt,
>

Thanks Wenbo.


> Test 1 nonsmooth
> zhaowenbo@ubuntu:~/test_slepc/SPARK/spark$ make NCORE=1 runkr_nonsmooth
> mpirun -n 1 ./step-41 \
>    -st_ksp_type gmres  -st_ksp_view -st_ksp_monitor  \
>    -st_pc_type gamg -st_pc_gamg_type agg -st_pc_gamg_agg_nsmooths 0 \
>    -mata AMAT.dat -matb BMAT.dat \
>    -eps_nev 1 -eps_ncv 10  -eps_monitor  -log_view > log_nonsmooth 2>&1
>
> Test 2 smooth
> zhaowenbo@ubuntu:~/test_slepc/SPARK/spark$ make NCORE=1 runkr_smooth
> mpirun -n 1 ./step-41 \
>    -st_ksp_type gmres -st_ksp_view -st_ksp_monitor  \
>    -st_pc_type gamg -st_pc_gamg_type agg -st_pc_gamg_agg_nsmooths 1 \
>    -mata AMAT.dat -matb BMAT.dat \
>    -eps_nev 1 -eps_ncv 10  -eps_monitor -log_view > log_smooth 2>&1
> makefile:43: recipe for target 'runkr_smooth' failed
> make: *** [runkr_smooth] Error 91
>
>
Mark, the solve is not failing, its the construction of the interpolator I
think. Check out this stack

[0]PETSC ERROR: --------------------- Error Message
--------------------------------------------------------------
[0]PETSC ERROR:
[0]PETSC ERROR: KSPSolve has not converged
[0]PETSC ERROR: See http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/documentation/faq.html for
trouble shooting.
[0]PETSC ERROR: Petsc Release Version 3.8.0, unknown
[0]PETSC ERROR: ./step-41 on a arch-linux2-c-debug named ubuntu by
zhaowenbo Mon Oct  2 08:00:58 2017
[0]PETSC ERROR: Configure options --with-mpi=1 --with-shared-libraries=1
--with-64-bit-indices=1 --with-debugging=1
[0]PETSC ERROR: #1 KSPSolve() line 855 in
/home/zhaowenbo/research/petsc/petsc_git/src/ksp/ksp/interface/itfunc.c
[0]PETSC ERROR: #2 PCGAMGOptProlongator_AGG() line 1186 in
/home/zhaowenbo/research/petsc/petsc_git/src/ksp/pc/impls/gamg/agg.c
[0]PETSC ERROR: #3 PCSetUp_GAMG() line 528 in
/home/zhaowenbo/research/petsc/petsc_git/src/ksp/pc/impls/gamg/gamg.c
[0]PETSC ERROR: #4 PCSetUp() line 924 in
/home/zhaowenbo/research/petsc/petsc_git/src/ksp/pc/interface/precon.c
[0]PETSC ERROR: #5 KSPSetUp() line 378 in
/home/zhaowenbo/research/petsc/petsc_git/src/ksp/ksp/interface/itfunc.c
[0]PETSC ERROR: #6 STSetUp_Shift() line 129 in
/home/zhaowenbo/research/slepc/slepc_git/src/sys/classes/st/impls/shift/shift.c
[0]PETSC ERROR: #7 STSetUp() line 281 in
/home/zhaowenbo/research/slepc/slepc_git/src/sys/classes/st/interface/stsolve.c
[0]PETSC ERROR: #8 EPSSetUp() line 273 in
/home/zhaowenbo/research/slepc/slepc_git/src/eps/interface/epssetup.c
[0]PETSC ERROR: #9 solve_diffusion_3d() line 1029 in src/diffu.c
[0]PETSC ERROR: #10 main() line 25 in src/main.c
[0]PETSC ERROR: PETSc Option Table entries:
[0]PETSC ERROR: -eps_monitor
[0]PETSC ERROR: -eps_ncv 10
[0]PETSC ERROR: -eps_nev 1
[0]PETSC ERROR: -log_view
[0]PETSC ERROR: -mata AMAT.dat
[0]PETSC ERROR: -matb BMAT.dat
[0]PETSC ERROR: -st_ksp_monitor
[0]PETSC ERROR: -st_ksp_type gmres
[0]PETSC ERROR: -st_ksp_view
[0]PETSC ERROR: -st_pc_gamg_agg_nsmooths 1
[0]PETSC ERROR: -st_pc_gamg_type agg
[0]PETSC ERROR: -st_pc_type gamg
[0]PETSC ERROR: ----------------End of Error Message -------send entire
error message to petsc-ma...@mcs.anl.gov----------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
MPI_ABORT was invoked on rank 0 in communicator MPI_COMM_WORLD
with errorcode 91.

  Thanks,

     Matt


> Thanks,
>
> Wenbo
>
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 10:48 PM, Matthew Knepley <knep...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Wenbo Zhao <zhaowenbo.n...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Mark,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Mark Adams <mfad...@lbl.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please send the output with -st_ksp_view and -st_ksp_monitor and we can
>>>> start to debug it.
>>>>
>>>> Test 1 with nonsmooth and preonly is OK
>>> zhaowenbo@ubuntu:~/test_slepc/SPARK/spark$ make NCORE=1 runkr_nonsmooth
>>> mpirun -n 1 ./step-41 \
>>>    -st_ksp_type gmres  -st_ksp_view -st_ksp_monitor  \
>>>    -st_pc_type gamg -st_pc_gamg_type agg -st_pc_gamg_agg_nsmooths 0 \
>>>    -st_ksp_view  -mata AMAT.dat -matb BMAT.dat \
>>>    -st_mg_coarse_ksp_type preonly   -st_mg_coarse_ksp_monitor  \
>>>    -eps_nev 1 -eps_ncv 10  -eps_monitor  -log_view > log_nonsmooth 2>&1
>>>
>>> Test 2 smooth and preonly is not OK
>>> zhaowenbo@ubuntu:~/test_slepc/SPARK/spark$ make NCORE=1 runkr_smooth
>>> mpirun -n 1 ./step-41 \
>>>    -st_ksp_type gmres -st_ksp_view -st_ksp_monitor  \
>>>    -st_pc_type gamg -st_pc_gamg_type agg -st_pc_gamg_agg_nsmooths 1 \
>>>    -st_ksp_view  -mata AMAT.dat -matb BMAT.dat \
>>>    -st_mg_coarse_ksp_type preonly   -st_mg_coarse_ksp_monitor  \
>>>    -eps_nev 1 -eps_ncv 10  -eps_monitor -log_view > log_smooth 2>&1
>>> makefile:43: recipe for target 'runkr_smooth' failed
>>> make: *** [runkr_smooth] Error 91
>>>
>>> Test 3 nonsmooth and gmres is not OK
>>> zhaowenbo@ubuntu:~/test_slepc/SPARK/spark$ make NCORE=1 runkr_gmres
>>> mpirun -n 1 ./step-41 \
>>>    -st_ksp_type gmres  -st_ksp_view -st_ksp_monitor  \
>>>    -st_pc_type gamg -st_pc_gamg_type agg -st_pc_gamg_agg_nsmooths 0 \
>>>    -st_ksp_view  -mata AMAT.dat -matb BMAT.dat \
>>>    -st_mg_coarse_ksp_type gmres  -st_mg_coarse_ksp_monitor
>>> -st_mg_coarse_ksp_rtol 1.0e-6 \
>>>
>>
>> DO NOT DO THIS. Please send the output where you do NOTHING to the coarse
>> solver.
>>
>>   Thanks,
>>
>>      Matt
>>
>>
>>>    -eps_nev 1 -eps_ncv 10  -eps_monitor  -log_view > log_gmres 2>&1
>>> makefile:59: recipe for target 'runkr_gmres' failed
>>> make: *** [runkr_gmres] Error 91
>>>
>>> log-files is attached.
>>>
>>>
>>> You mentioned that B is not symmetric. I assume it is elliptic
>>>> (diffusion). Where does the asymmetry come from?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> It is a two-group diffusion equations, where group denotes neutron
>>> enegry discretisation.
>>> Matrix B consists of neutron diffusion/leakage term, removal term and
>>> minus neutron scatter source term between different energies, when matrix A
>>> denotes neutron fission source.
>>>
>>> Diffusion term(Laplace operator) is elliptic and symmetric. Removal term
>>> is diagonal only. However scatter term is asymmetry since scatter term from
>>> high energy to low energy is far greater than the term from low to high.
>>>
>>>
>>> Wenbo
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Wenbo Zhao <zhaowenbo.n...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Matt,
>>>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>>>> For the defalt option doesnt work firstly( -st_ksp_type gmres
>>>>> -st_pc_type gamg -st_pc_gamg_type agg -st_pc_gamg_agg_nsmooths 1), I tried
>>>>> to test those options.
>>>>>
>>>>> Wenbo
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 9:08 PM, Matthew Knepley <knep...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 8:30 AM, Wenbo Zhao <zhaowenbo.n...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Because I am not clear about what will happen using 'preonly' for
>>>>>>> large scale problem.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The size of the problem has nothing to do with 'preonly'. All it
>>>>>> means is to apply a preconditioner without a Krylov solver.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It seems to use a direct solver from below,
>>>>>>> http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-current/docs/manualpages/
>>>>>>> KSP/KSPPREONLY.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, I still cannot understand why you would change the default?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   Matt
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>> Wenbo
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Matthew Knepley <knep...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 9:53 PM, Wenbo Zhao <
>>>>>>>> zhaowenbo.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Matt,
>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your reply.
>>>>>>>>> It DOES make no sense for this problem.
>>>>>>>>> But I am not clear about the 'preonly' option. Which solver is
>>>>>>>>> used in preonly? I wonder if 'preonly' is suitable for large scale 
>>>>>>>>> problem
>>>>>>>>> such as 400,000,000 unknowns.
>>>>>>>>> So I tried 'gmres' option and found these error messages.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I mean, why are you setting this at all. Just do not set the coarse
>>>>>>>> solver. The default should work fine.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   Thanks,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     Matt
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Could you give me some suggestions?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Wenbo
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 12:34 AM, Matthew Knepley <
>>>>>>>>> knep...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 6:49 AM, Wenbo Zhao <
>>>>>>>>>> zhaowenbo.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I met some questions when I use PETSC/SLEPC to solve two-group
>>>>>>>>>>> neutron diffusion equations with finite difference method. The grid 
>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>> 3*3*3, when DOF on each points is 2. So the matrix size is 54*54.
>>>>>>>>>>> It is generalized eigenvalue problem Ax=\lamda Bx, where B is
>>>>>>>>>>> diagonally dominant matrix but not symmetry.
>>>>>>>>>>> EPS is set as below,
>>>>>>>>>>>  ierr = EPSSetProblemType(eps,EPS_GNHEP);CHKERRQ(ierr);¬
>>>>>>>>>>>  ierr = EPSSetWhichEigenpairs(eps,EPS_
>>>>>>>>>>> LARGEST_REAL);CHKERRQ(ierr);¬
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Krylovschur is used as eps sovler. GAMG is used as PC.
>>>>>>>>>>> I tried agg_nsmooths and mg_coarse_ksp_type. Only non-smooths
>>>>>>>>>>> and preonly is OK.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why are you setting the coarse solver. This makes no sense.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>    Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     Matt
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Test 1
>>>>>>>>>>> $ make NCORE=1 runkr_nonsmooth
>>>>>>>>>>> mpirun -n 1 ./step-41 \
>>>>>>>>>>>    -st_ksp_type gmres  \
>>>>>>>>>>>    -st_pc_type gamg -st_pc_gamg_type agg
>>>>>>>>>>> -st_pc_gamg_agg_nsmooths 0 \
>>>>>>>>>>>    -st_ksp_view  -mata AMAT.dat -matb BMAT.dat \
>>>>>>>>>>>    -st_mg_coarse_ksp_type preonly   -st_mg_coarse_ksp_monitor  \
>>>>>>>>>>>    -eps_nev 1 -eps_ncv 10  -eps_monitor  -log_view >
>>>>>>>>>>> log_nonsmooth 2>&1
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Test 2
>>>>>>>>>>> $ make NCORE=1 runkr_smooth
>>>>>>>>>>> mpirun -n 1 ./step-41 \
>>>>>>>>>>>    -st_ksp_type gmres  \
>>>>>>>>>>>    -st_pc_type gamg -st_pc_gamg_type agg
>>>>>>>>>>> -st_pc_gamg_agg_nsmooths 1 \
>>>>>>>>>>>    -st_ksp_view  -mata AMAT.dat -matb BMAT.dat \
>>>>>>>>>>>    -st_mg_coarse_ksp_type preonly   -st_mg_coarse_ksp_monitor  \
>>>>>>>>>>>    -eps_nev 1 -eps_ncv 10  -eps_monitor -log_view > log_smooth
>>>>>>>>>>> 2>&1
>>>>>>>>>>> makefile:43: recipe for target 'runkr_smooth' failed
>>>>>>>>>>> make: *** [runkr_smooth] Error 91
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Test 3
>>>>>>>>>>> $ make NCORE=1 runkr_gmres
>>>>>>>>>>> mpirun -n 1 ./step-41 \
>>>>>>>>>>>    -st_ksp_type gmres  \
>>>>>>>>>>>    -st_pc_type gamg -st_pc_gamg_type agg
>>>>>>>>>>> -st_pc_gamg_agg_nsmooths 0 \
>>>>>>>>>>>    -st_ksp_view  -mata AMAT.dat -matb BMAT.dat \
>>>>>>>>>>>    -st_mg_coarse_ksp_type gmres  -st_mg_coarse_ksp_monitor
>>>>>>>>>>> -st_mg_coarse_ksp_rtol 1.0e-6 \
>>>>>>>>>>>    -eps_nev 1 -eps_ncv 10  -eps_monitor  -log_view > log_gmres
>>>>>>>>>>> 2>&1
>>>>>>>>>>> makefile:59: recipe for target 'runkr_gmres' failed
>>>>>>>>>>> make: *** [runkr_gmres] Error 91
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Log files were attched.
>>>>>>>>>>> The matrix file were also attched as AMAT.dat and BMAT.dat.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Is it correct? Or something wrong with my code or commad-line?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Wenbo
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>>>>>>>>>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which 
>>>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>>>> experiments lead.
>>>>>>>>>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.caam.rice.edu/%7Emk51/>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>>>>>>>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which 
>>>>>>>> their
>>>>>>>> experiments lead.
>>>>>>>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
>>>>>>>> <http://www.caam.rice.edu/%7Emk51/>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>>>>>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which 
>>>>>> their
>>>>>> experiments lead.
>>>>>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
>>>>>> <http://www.caam.rice.edu/%7Emk51/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
>> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
>> experiments lead.
>> -- Norbert Wiener
>>
>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/>
>>
>
>


-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener

https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/>

Reply via email to