Dear all,

I am solving a system of nonlinear, transient PDEs. I am using Newton's method 
in every time step to solve the nonlinear algebraic equations. Of course, 
Newton's method only converges if the initial guess is sufficiently close to 
the solution.

This is often not the case and Newton's method diverges. Then, I reduce the 
time step and try again. This can become prohibitively costly, if the time 
steps get very small. I am thus looking for variants of Newton's method, which 
have a bigger convergence radius or ideally converge all the time.

I tried out the pseudo-timestepping described in 
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/petsc/petsc-current/src/ts/examples/tutorials/ex1f.F.html.

However, this does converge even worse. I am seeing breakdown when I have phase 
changes (e.g. liquid to two-phase).

I was under the impression that pseudo-timestepping should converge better. 
Thus, my question:

Am I doing something wrong or is it possible that Newton's method converges and 
pseudo-timestepping does not?

Thank you for any insight on this.

Henrik




--
Dipl.-Math. Henrik Büsing
Institute for Applied Geophysics and Geothermal Energy
E.ON Energy Research Center
RWTH Aachen University
------------------------------------------------------
Mathieustr. 10            |    Tel +49 (0)241 80 49907
52074 Aachen, Germany     |    Fax +49 (0)241 80 49889
------------------------------------------------------
http://www.eonerc.rwth-aachen.de/GGE
[email protected]
------------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to