When you say "Jacobians are bad" and "debugging the Jacobians", do you mean that the hand-coded Jacobian is wrong? In that case, why would you be surprised that the finite difference Jacobians, which are "correct" to approximation error, perform better? Otherwise, what does "Jacobians are bad" mean - ill-conditioned? Singular? Not symmetric? Not positive definite?
- [petsc-users] Matrix-free vs finite differenced Jacobian... Alexander Lindsay
- Re: [petsc-users] Matrix-free vs finite differenced... Matthew Knepley
- Re: [petsc-users] Matrix-free vs finite differe... zakaryah .
- Re: [petsc-users] Matrix-free vs finite dif... Alexander Lindsay
- Re: [petsc-users] Matrix-free vs finite... Matthew Knepley
- Re: [petsc-users] Matrix-free vs f... Alexander Lindsay
- Re: [petsc-users] Matrix-free ... Matthew Knepley
- Re: [petsc-users] Matrix-f... Alexander Lindsay
- Re: [petsc-users] Matrix-f... Smith, Barry F.
- Re: [petsc-users] Matrix-free ... Smith, Barry F.
- Re: [petsc-users] Matrix-f... Alexander Lindsay
- Re: [petsc-users] Matrix-f... Matthew Knepley
- Re: [petsc-users] Matrix-f... Alexander Lindsay
