On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:54 AM, Y. Shidi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > Is your claim that you do >> >> MatView() >> > I did not call this function; I called MatLoad() directly. >
This is the output function. > > and get a different matrix? This is unlikely since we test this. >> Are you sure you have the same rhs? >> > I will check this again. > So if a binary matrix file is created, > it doesn't matter if different number of processors is used. > Right. Matt > Thanks, > Shidi > > On 2018-05-23 16:48, Matthew Knepley wrote: > >> On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 11:45 AM, Y. Shidi <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >>> >>> How are you evaluating? >>>> >>> I put the loaded matrix to a linear system and solve it. >>> >> >> Is your claim that you do >> >> MatView() >> >> and then >> >> MatLoad() >> >> and get a different matrix? This is unlikely since we test this. >> Are you sure you have the same rhs? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Matt >> >> Cheers, >>> Shidi >>> >>> On 2018-05-23 16:42, Jed Brown wrote: >>> "Y. Shidi" <[email protected]> writes: >>> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Is there any way to sequentially load a binary matrix file, which >>> is created in parallel? >>> I tried to use PetscViewerBinaryOpen() and MatLoad() to load >>> the matrix that is created by using 2 cores, and solved a linear >>> system by using this matrix but the results is not correct. >>> >>> How are you evaluating? >>> >> >> -- >> >> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their >> experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which >> their experiments lead. >> -- Norbert Wiener >> >> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ [1] >> >> >> Links: >> ------ >> [1] http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/ >> > -- What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead. -- Norbert Wiener https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.caam.rice.edu/~mk51/>
