> On Nov 29, 2018, at 4:50 PM, Sajid Ali <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> Another question I want to ask is about dttol that is used in the Monitor 
> function as follows :
> 
> 417:   dttol = .0001;
> 418:   PetscOptionsGetReal(NULL,NULL,"-dttol",&dttol,NULL);
> 419:   if (dt < dttol) {
> 420:     dt  *= .999;
> 421:     TSSetTimeStep(ts,dt);
> 422:   }
> 
> Is this decreasing dt if it's less than tolerance ? 

   Yes, note this is arbitrary and there would never be a reason to change dt 
by .999; it is just to test that TSSetTimeStep() works.

> 
> I commented out the norm calculation (lines 404-415) the time is stuck at 0 ( 
> as per the output of -ts_monitor).

   This is because dt is never set (when you comment out those lines), and 
since it is never set it is likely zero hence less than dttol hence 
TSSetTimeStep() is called with a value of 0.0 which is why it gets "stuck" at 
0.0;

> But if I comment out the above lines (417-422) as well, everything works 
> fine. What explains this behaviour ?
> 
> Thank You! 
> Sajid Ali
> Applied Physics
> Northwestern University

Reply via email to