If it is not too complicated it would be nice if MPICreateSubMatricesMPI would be avaible for other matrices than MPIAIJ.
--
On Mon, Mar 18, 2019 at 10:30 PM Marius Buerkle <[email protected]> wrote:
I have another question regarding MatCreateRedundantMatrix and MPICreateSubMatricesMPI. The former works for MPIAIJ and MPIDENSE and the later only for MPIAIJ. Would it be possible to use MatCreateRedundantMatrix with a factored matrix
We usually do not have direct access to the data for factored matrices since it lives in the factorization package.
and MPICreateSubMatricesMPI with dense and/or elemental matrices ?
This would not be hard, it would just take time. The dense case is easy. I think Elemental already has such an operation, but we would have to find it and call it.
Thanks,
Matt
Indeed, was very easy to add. Are you going to include the Fortran interface for MPICreateSubMatricesMPI in future releases of PETSC ?
Regarding my initial problem, thanks a lot. It works very well with MPICreateSubMatricesMPI and the solution can be implemented in a few lines.
Thanks and Best,
Marius
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 4:50 AM Marius Buerkle <[email protected]> wrote:I tried to follow your suggestions but it seems there is no MPICreateSubMatricesMPI for Fortran. Is this correct?We just have to write the binding. Its almost identical to MatCreateSubMatrices() in src/mat/interface/ftn-custom/zmatrixf.cMattOn Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 6:57 PM Marius Buerkle <[email protected]> wrote:ok, I think I understand now. I will give it a try and if there is some trouble comeback to you. thanks.Cool.MattmariusOn Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 8:42 PM Marius Buerkle <[email protected]> wrote:ok, so it seems there is no straight forward way to transfer data between PETSc matrices on different subcomms. Probably doing it by "hand" extracting the matricies on the subcomms create a MPI_INTERCOMM transfering the data to PETSC_COMM_WORLD and assembling them in a new PETSc matrix would be possible, right?That sounds too complicated. Why not just reverse MPICreateSubMatricesMPI()? Meaning make it collective on the whole big communicator, so that you can swap out all the subcommunicator for the aggregation call, just like we do in that function.Then its really just a matter of reversing the communication call.MattOn Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 7:12 PM Marius Buerkle <[email protected]> wrote:I see. This would work if the matrices are on different subcommumicators ? Is it possible to add this functionality ?Hmm, no. That is specialized to serial matrices. You need the inverse of MatCreateSubMatricesMPI().Thanks,MattmariusYou basically need the inverse of MatCreateSubmatrices(). I do not think we have that right now, but it could probably be done without too much trouble by looking at that code.Thanks,MattOn Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 6:15 AM Marius Buerkle via petsc-users <[email protected]> wrote:Hi !Is there some way to combine MatCompositeMerge with MatCreateRedundantMatrix? I basically want to create copies of a matrix from PETSC_COMM_WORLD to subcommunicators, do some work on each subcommunicator and than gather the results back to PETSC_COMM_WORLD, namely I want to sum the the invidual matrices from the subcommunicatos component wise and get the resulting matrix on PETSC_COMM_WORLD. Is this somehow possible without going through all the hassle of using MPI directly?marius--What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener--What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener--What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener--What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener--What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
-- Norbert Wiener
