Dear Matthew and Satish, I just wrote that the error disappeared, but it still exists (I had to wait longer).
The configuration log can be accessed here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/tmkksemu294j719/configure.log?dl=0 Sorry for the last e-mail. Michael. On 09/20/2019 03:53 PM, Balay, Satish wrote: > --with-64-bit-indices=1 => PetscInt = int64_t > --known-64-bit-blas-indices=1 => blas specified uses 64bit indices. > > What is your requirement (use case)? > > Satish > > On Fri, 20 Sep 2019, Povolotskyi, Mykhailo via petsc-users wrote: > >> Does it mean I have to configure petsc with --with-64-bit-indices=1 ? >> >> On 09/20/2019 03:41 PM, Matthew Knepley wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 1:55 PM Povolotskyi, Mykhailo via petsc-users >> <petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov<mailto:petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov>> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm upgrading petsc from 3.8 to 3.11. >> >> In doing so, I see an error message: >> >> UNABLE to CONFIGURE with GIVEN OPTIONS (see configure.log for details): >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Cannot use SuperLU_DIST with 64 bit BLAS/Lapack indices >> ******************************************************************************* >> >> I wonder why this configuration step worked well for 3.8? I did not >> change anything else but version of petsc. >> >> This never worked. We are just checking now. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Matt >> >> Thank you, >> >> Michael. >> >> >> >> -- >> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments >> is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments >> lead. >> -- Norbert Wiener >> >> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/<http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/%7Eknepley/> >> >>