Excellent! That sounds great. 

Thank you for your response. 

Regards, 

Mukkund

> On 30 Jun 2020, at 23:55, Mark Adams <mfad...@lbl.gov> wrote:
> 
> You want to make an MR (check to delete branch after merge and squash 
> commits), you can mark as WIP, run the pipeline and after you get it to run 
> clean and merge any comments, umark WIP. If it does not get merged in a few 
> days you could ask Satish.
> Mark
> 
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 5:12 PM MUKKUND SUNJII <mukkundsun...@gmail.com 
> <mailto:mukkundsun...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Greetings, 
> 
> Thank you for your message. 
> 
> Excellent! Does it suffice to ask for the merge request once I made the 
> necessary additions to ex11.c?
> 
> Regards, 
> 
> Mukkund 
> 
>> On 30 Jun 2020, at 19:16, Matthew Knepley <knep...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:knep...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 12:56 PM MUKKUND SUNJII <mukkundsun...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:mukkundsun...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> Greetings, 
>> 
>> I am a master’s student in TU Delft, The Netherlands, and I am carrying out 
>> my thesis using the adaptive mesh refinement solver provided in 
>> ./ts/tutorials/ex11.c. 
>> 
>> In the process of my work, I have added a HLL Riemann Solver for the shallow 
>> water equation. I had already tested and validated the Riemann Solver using 
>> several cases (I am happy to provide a copy of my thesis report). It would 
>> indeed be nice to see my work reflected in the current version of ex11.c as 
>> an addition to its capability. 
>> 
>> Furthermore, I had also added a Riemann Solver that contains topography 
>> terms and is well-balanced*. The caveat is that I see that there some 
>> variations in the well-balancedness when choosing between p4est and Plex 
>> DM’s. Perhaps, this could be looked at and fixed in the future. 
>> 
>> The purpose of this email is to propose the addition of the HLL Riemann 
>> Solver for the shallow water equations to ex11.c and perhaps later explore 
>> the possibility of adding the Riemann Solver with the bathymetry terms. 
>> 
>> I have already gone through the CI process instituted by PETSc (previously 
>> integrated ./ts/tutorials/ex54.c into the repository with the valuable 
>> assistance of Mr. Satish Balay). Hence, I would be more or less familiar 
>> with the process. 
>> 
>> I kindly ask you provide any feedback on this proposition. 
>> 
>> Yes, this sounds great to me.
>> 
>>   Thanks,
>> 
>>      Matt
>>  
>> Regards, 
>> 
>> Mukkund Sunjii 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments 
>> is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments 
>> lead.
>> -- Norbert Wiener
>> 
>> https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>

Reply via email to