Yes. We will wait for his reply. -Sherry On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 6:30 PM Barry Smith <bsm...@petsc.dev> wrote:
> > Thanks Sherry. But the CPU version runs correctly right so if Felix is > only interested in CPUs then I could give it to him now? > > Barry > > > On Jul 21, 2020, at 7:33 PM, Xiaoye S. Li <x...@lbl.gov> wrote: > > Barry, > > We have a macro-ized basefile to produced all 4 precisions for > SuperLU_DIST. In the past, we didn't generate single precision code, since > there was no request. > > Since now we started working on mixed precision algorithms. I generated > single precision code a few weeks ago, and fixed some bugs on the way. A > few days ago, I nailed down a final bug (hopefully) related to single > precision SGEMM or STRSM BLAS problems on GPU (i.e., single precision > cuBLAS error). All I know is that CPU code is working on Summit, but it > has computation errors after I enable GPU. I plan to do some more > investigation on this before asking Nvidia folks. > > I am busy this week, but should get to it next week. I suggest you wait > for me to clear this, instead of duplicating the work. > > Sherry > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 5:22 PM Barry Smith <bsm...@petsc.dev> wrote: > >> >> Felix, >> >> What are your needs, do you want this for CPUs or for GPUs? Do you >> wish to run all your code in single precision or just the SuperLU_Dist >> solver while the rest of your code double? >> >> If you want to run everything on CPUs using single precision then >> adding the support is very easy, we can provide that for you any time. The >> other cases will require more thought. >> >> Barry >> >> >> > On Jul 21, 2020, at 8:58 AM, f...@rzg.mpg.de wrote: >> > >> > Dear PETSc support team, >> > some time ago you told me that you are planning on releasing a version >> that supports SUPERLU_DIST in single-precision soon. Can you tell me >> roughly what time frame you had in mind? >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Felix >> > >> >> >