It looks like Victor is working on hypre-ILU so it is active. PETSc used to have PILUT support, but it was so buggy/leaky that we removed the interface.
Alexander Lindsay <alexlindsay...@gmail.com> writes: > Haha no I am not sure. There are a few other preconditioning options I will > explore before knocking on this door some more. > > On Jun 22, 2023, at 6:49 PM, Matthew Knepley <knep...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 8:37 PM Alexander Lindsay > <alexlindsay...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I know that PETSc has hooks for Euclid but I discovered today that it does > not support 64 bit indices, which many MOOSE > applications need. This would probably be more appropriate for a hypre > support forum (does anyone know if such a forum > exists other than opening GitHub issues?), but does anyone here know what > the difference between hypre-ILU and > hypre-Euclid are? From the docs it seems they are both supposed to be > parallel ILU solvers. > > If hypre-ILU worked with 64 bit indices (I can probably check this sifting > through the sources), then I would probably add > hooks for it in PETSc (AFAICT those don't exist at present). > > My understanding was that two different people were working on them. I do > not know if either is still actively supported. We > would of course like a binding to whatever is supported. > > Are you sure you want to run ILU? > > THanks, > > Matt > -- > What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments > is infinitely more interesting than any results to > which their experiments lead. > -- Norbert Wiener > > https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
