On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:04 AM Thuc Bui <b...@calcreek.com> wrote:

> Hi Barry,
>
>
>
> Visual Studio 2022 is the problem! The code linked to Petsc 3.18.6 built
> with VS 2022 also crashes at the same place. The same errors are shown
> below. I don’t remember for sure, but I don’t think I was able to configure
> Petsc 3.19.4 with VS 2019. However, I will still try that next.
>

It is so easy to hate VS. This suggests that VS is secretly linking to
another BLAS, perhaps with different calling semantics.

  Thanks,

     Matt


> Thanks for your help,
>
> Thuc
>
>
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: Caught signal number 11 SEGV: Segmentation Violation,
> probably memory access out of range
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: Try option -start_in_debugger or -on_error_attach_debugger
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: or see https://petsc.org/release/faq/#valgrind and
> https://petsc.org/release/faq/
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: ---------------------  Stack Frames
> ------------------------------------
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: The line numbers in the error traceback are not always
> exact.
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: #1 BLASdot()
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: #2 VecNorm_Seq() at
> D:\Users\bbwannabe\Documents\Petsc\petsc-3.18.6\src\vec\vec\impls\seq\bvec2.c:216
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: #3 VecNorm() at
> D:\Users\bbwannabe\Documents\Petsc\petsc-3.18.6\src\vec\vec\interface\rvector.c:237
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: #4 VecNormalize() at
> D:\Users\bbwannabe\Documents\Petsc\petsc-3.18.6\src\vec\vec\interface\rvector.c:318
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: #5 KSPGMRESCycle() at
> D:\Users\bbwannabe\Documents\Petsc\petsc-3.18.6\src\ksp\ksp\impls\gmres\gmres.c:111
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: #6 KSPSolve_GMRES() at
> D:\Users\bbwannabe\Documents\Petsc\petsc-3.18.6\src\ksp\ksp\impls\gmres\gmres.c:228
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: #7 KSPSolve_Private() at
> D:\Users\bbwannabe\Documents\Petsc\petsc-3.18.6\src\ksp\ksp\interface\itfunc.c:899
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: #8 KSPSolve() at
> D:\Users\bbwannabe\Documents\Petsc\petsc-3.18.6\src\ksp\ksp\interface\itfunc.c:1071
>
>
>
> job aborted:
>
> [ranks] message
>
>
>
> [0] application aborted
>
> aborting MPI_COMM_WORLD (comm=0x44000000), error 59, comm rank 0
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* petsc-users [mailto:petsc-users-boun...@mcs.anl.gov] *On Behalf
> Of *Thuc Bui
> *Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2023 4:24 PM
> *To:* 'Barry Smith'
> *Cc:* 'PETSc users list'
> *Subject:* Re: [petsc-users] Problem with BLASdot in 3.19.4
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot Barry, for getting back to me. Will do what you have
> suggested, and get back with the results.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thuc
>
>
>
> *From:* Barry Smith [mailto:bsm...@petsc.dev]
> *Sent:* Monday, September 18, 2023 3:43 PM
> *To:* Thuc Bui
> *Cc:* PETSc users list
> *Subject:* Re: [petsc-users] Problem with BLASdot in 3.19.4
>
>
>
>
>
>   Ok, two things are being changed at the same time: the version  of PETSc
> and the version of Visual Studio.
>
>
>
>   Could you please try with the new Visual Studio version but the same
> older PETSc version? If that works could you try with the old Visual Studio
> version but the new PETSc version?
>
>
>
>   Barry
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sep 18, 2023, at 6:26 PM, Thuc Bui <b...@calcreek.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear Petsc users and experts,
>
>
>
> If someone can direct me how to track this bug, I would really appreciate
> it.
>
>
>
> The Petsc DLL library version 3.19.4 was built on Windows 10 with Visual
> Studio 2022, and with Microsoft MPI 10.1.2 and Intel MKL 2020.3.279. The
> same code works fine with Petsc 3.18.6 using the same versions of MS MPI
> and Intel MKL, and built with Visual Studio 2019.
>
>
>
> When my code calls PetscCall(KSPSolve(...)), it gets to
> PetscCall(KSPGMRESCycle(...)), PetscCall(VecNormalize(VEC_VV(0), &res)),
> PetscCall(VecNorm(x, NORM_2, &norm)) and then crashes in VecNorm_Seq() at:
>
>
>
>                 PetscCallBLAS("BLASdot", ztmp[type == NORM_1_AND_2] =
> PetscSqrtReal(PetscRealPart(BLASdot_(&bn, xx, &one, xx, &one))));
>
>
>
> I tried to step into BLASdot_, but was unable to. I assume BLASdot_ belong
> to Intel MKL, and its library does not contain debug information. After the
> code exits, the errors are shown below the hash line.
>
>
>
> Should I install the latest Intel MKL to work with Petsc 3.19.4?
>
>
>
> Many thanks in advance for your help,
>
> Thuc Bui
>
> Senior R&D Engineer
>
> Calabazas Creek Research, Inc
>
> (650) 948-5361
>
>
>
>
>
> ###############################################
>
>
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR:
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: Caught signal number 11 SEGV: Segmentation Violation,
> probably memory access out of range
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: Try option -start_in_debugger or -on_error_attach_debugger
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: or see https://petsc.org/release/faq/#valgrind and
> https://petsc.org/release/faq/
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: ---------------------  Stack Frames
> ------------------------------------
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: The line numbers in the error traceback are not always
> exact.
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: #1 BLASdot()
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: #2 VecNorm_Seq() at
> D:\Users\bbwannabe\Documents\Petsc\latest\src\vec\vec\impls\seq\bvec2.c:213
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: #3 VecNorm() at
> D:\Users\bbwannabe\Documents\Petsc\latest\src\vec\vec\interface\rvector.c:237
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: #4 VecNormalize() at
> D:\Users\bbwannabe\Documents\Petsc\latest\src\vec\vec\interface\rvector.c:318
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: #5 KSPGMRESCycle() at
> D:\Users\bbwannabe\Documents\Petsc\latest\src\ksp\ksp\impls\gmres\gmres.c:110
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: #6 KSPSolve_GMRES() at
> D:\Users\bbwannabe\Documents\Petsc\latest\src\ksp\ksp\impls\gmres\gmres.c:227
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: #7 KSPSolve_Private() at
> D:\Users\bbwannabe\Documents\Petsc\latest\src\ksp\ksp\interface\itfunc.c:898
>
> [0]PETSC ERROR: #8 KSPSolve() at
> D:\Users\bbwannabe\Documents\Petsc\latest\src\ksp\ksp\interface\itfunc.c:1070
>
>
>
> job aborted:
>
> [ranks] message
>
>
>
> [0] application aborted
>
> aborting MPI_COMM_WORLD (comm=0x44000000), error 59, comm rank 0
>
>
>


-- 
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener

https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/ <http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/>

Reply via email to