Thanks for the clarification.
However, would it be more consistent to differentiate between 0D (vertex sets), 
1D (edge sets), 2d (faces) and 3D (cell sets)? 
If I want to now apply boundary condition on a face with tag 1, it would 
contain the 4 edges making up that face and an additional edge with the same 
physical tag? 
Basically, I can’t differentiate between the two entities


Thanks,
Sharan 



Group - Theory & Simulation
Department of Microstructure Physics & Alloy Design



 From:   Matthew Knepley <knep...@gmail.com> 
 To:   Sharan Roongta <s.roon...@mpie.de> 
 Cc:   "petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov" <petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov> 
 Sent:   13/12/2023 12:51 AM 
 Subject:   Re: [petsc-users] difference in Face Sets in latest petsc release 



On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 5:50 PM Sharan Roongta <s.roon...@mpie.de> wrote:


Hello,


I see discrepancy in the size/value of the 'Face Sets' printed in the current 
release v3.20.2 , and v3.18.6

Attached is the .msh file

-dm_view with v3.18.6

DM Object: Generated Mesh 1 MPI process
  type: plex
Generated Mesh in 3 dimensions:
  Number of 0-cells per rank: 14
  Number of 1-cells per rank: 49
  Number of 2-cells per rank: 60
  Number of 3-cells per rank: 24
Labels:
  celltype: 4 strata with value/size (0 (14), 6 (24), 3 (60), 1 (49))
  depth: 4 strata with value/size (0 (14), 1 (49), 2 (60), 3 (24))
  Cell Sets: 1 strata with value/size (1 (24))
  Face Sets: 5 strata with value/size (1 (4), 2 (4), 3 (4), 4 (4), 5 (4))

-dm_view with the current release (commit 4b9a870af96)


DM Object: Generated Mesh 1 MPI process
  type: plex
Generated Mesh in 3 dimensions:
  Number of 0-cells per rank: 14
  Number of 1-cells per rank: 49
  Number of 2-cells per rank: 60
  Number of 3-cells per rank: 24
Labels:
  celltype: 4 strata with value/size (0 (14), 6 (24), 3 (60), 1 (49))
  depth: 4 strata with value/size (0 (14), 1 (49), 2 (60), 3 (24))
  Cell Sets: 1 strata with value/size (1 (24))
  Face Sets: 12 strata with value/size (1 (5), 2 (5), 3 (5), 4 (5), 5 (5), 6 
(1), 7 (1), 8 (1), 9 (1), 10 (1), 11 (1), 12 (1))
I believe the older version printed the correct thing? Has something changed in 
the interpretation of Face Sets?



Yes. In the older version, I was only labeling cells, faces, and vertices. 
There were complaints, so I put in the edge labels. If you check, all the 
additional labels are on edges, and checking your .msh file, those edges 
clearly have those labels.


  Thanks,


     Matt
 

Thanks,
Sharan


Group - Theory & Simulation
Department of Microstructure Physics & Alloy Design
 
 
----------------
 -------------------------------------------------
 Stay up to date and follow us on LinkedIn, Twitter and YouTube.
 
 Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH
 Max-Planck-Straße 1
 D-40237 Düsseldorf
  
 Handelsregister B 2533 
 Amtsgericht Düsseldorf
  
 Geschäftsführung
 Prof. Dr. Gerhard Dehm
 Prof. Dr. Jörg Neugebauer
 Prof. Dr. Dierk Raabe
 Dr. Kai de Weldige
  
 Ust.-Id.-Nr.: DE 11 93 58 514 
 Steuernummer: 105 5891 1000
 
 
 Please consider that invitations and e-mails of our institute are 
 only valid if they end with …@mpie.de. 
 If you are not sure of the validity please contact r...@mpie.de
 
 Bitte beachten Sie, dass Einladungen zu Veranstaltungen und E-Mails
 aus unserem Haus nur mit der Endung …@mpie.de gültig sind. 
 In Zweifelsfällen wenden Sie sich bitte an r...@mpie.de
 -------------------------------------------------
 


-- 







What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their experiments is 
infinitely more interesting than any results to which their experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener


https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/~knepley/
 

-------------------------------------------------
Stay up to date and follow us on LinkedIn, Twitter and YouTube.

Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH
Max-Planck-Straße 1
D-40237 Düsseldorf
 
Handelsregister B 2533 
Amtsgericht Düsseldorf
 
Geschäftsführung
Prof. Dr. Gerhard Dehm
Prof. Dr. Jörg Neugebauer
Prof. Dr. Dierk Raabe
Dr. Kai de Weldige
 
Ust.-Id.-Nr.: DE 11 93 58 514 
Steuernummer: 105 5891 1000


Please consider that invitations and e-mails of our institute are 
only valid if they end with …@mpie.de. 
If you are not sure of the validity please contact r...@mpie.de

Bitte beachten Sie, dass Einladungen zu Veranstaltungen und E-Mails
aus unserem Haus nur mit der Endung …@mpie.de gültig sind. 
In Zweifelsfällen wenden Sie sich bitte an r...@mpie.de
-------------------------------------------------

Reply via email to