On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 1:51 PM Frank Bramkamp <bramk...@nsc.liu.se> wrote:
> Dear PETSc Team,
>
> a user of our computer center reported a PETSC issue.
> He uses petsc version 3.22.4 with gcc compiler
>
> The problem arises with MatGetRow and MatRestoreRow.
> PETSC compiled properly but his Fortran application then cannot find those
> routines. It seems to work in version 3.22.2. For me it also worked in
> 3.21.1
> calling those routines from fortran.
>
> It looks that the fortran stubs might have been broken for those two
> routines in version 3.22.4
>
> I will also test 3.22.4 now myself to confirm it or I can probably test a
> fixed version as well.
>
Hi Frank,
Yes, we have had that report. Barry has now completely rewritten the
Fortran bindings, replacing our old
binding generator, so that every exposed function should now have a
binding. This is a large change, but
should make everything much more maintainable. We plan to release 3.23 in a
week or two, and would advise
every Fortran user to upgrade, since this will be the standard going
forward. Does that timeline work for you?
Thanks,
Matt
> Greetings, Frank Bramkamp
>
--
What most experimenters take for granted before they begin their
experiments is infinitely more interesting than any results to which their
experiments lead.
-- Norbert Wiener
https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://www.cse.buffalo.edu/*knepley/__;fg!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YWfr-xc2NrmK8QCbpIUPpfzLuBVFIjQ6FDjpm9Iqv6mev-Y8WYiVtcGcK87_yJyOo3UR-RCvj05E0oOUsNmx$
<https://urldefense.us/v3/__http://www.cse.buffalo.edu/*knepley/__;fg!!G_uCfscf7eWS!YWfr-xc2NrmK8QCbpIUPpfzLuBVFIjQ6FDjpm9Iqv6mev-Y8WYiVtcGcK87_yJyOo3UR-RCvj05E0qLIO9cy$
>
