Barry and Jose,
I have gotten my compile issues down to the following:

   usolve.F:84:46:

       84 |       MatInfo        info(MAT_INFO_SIZE)
          |                                              1
   Error: Symbol 'mat_info_size' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type; did you
   mean 'mpi_win_size'?
   usolve.F:191:39:

      191 |             mal = info(MAT_INFO_MALLOCS)
          |                                       1
   Error: Symbol 'mat_info_mallocs' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type; did
   you mean 'mpi_info_null'?
   usolve.F:189:44:

      189 |             nza = info(MAT_INFO_NZ_ALLOCATED)
          |                                            1
   Error: Symbol 'mat_info_nz_allocated' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type;
   did you mean 'mpi_win_flavor_allocate'?
   usolve.F:190:39:

      190 |             nzr = info(MAT_INFO_NZ_USED)
          |                                       1
   Error: Symbol 'mat_info_nz_used' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type; did
   you mean 'mpi_info_null'?
   usolve.F:188:72:

      188 |             call MatGetInfo(Kmat, MAT_LOCAL, info, ierr)
   | 1
   Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 'matgetinfo'
   at (1)
   usolve.F:346:15:

It seems that my issues are revolve about MatInfo, but I can not see what I am doing wrong.
In terms of variable declarations, here is what I have

          MatInfo        info(MAT_INFO_SIZE)

One follow-up on a fix I made to remove some compile errors; I looked into petscksp.hf90 and found that the return value from KSPGetConvergedReason(kspsol,reason,ierr) can be accessed as reason%v. Is there a recommended way to get the value of the reason?  My use of reason%v seems rather unclean.  The use case is I want to know if the reason value is .gt.0 or .lt.0 and then given that I want to print a custom string to stdout and to a file unit.

All hints appreciated,
-sanjay



On 3/23/25 2:13 AM, Sanjay Govindjee wrote:
Jose,
Using the pointer construction to set up the arrays has resolved the issue with finding the preallocation interfaces.
I'll look at the other issues tomorrow.  Thanks for the help.
-sanjay
-

On 3/23/25 1:43 AM, Sanjay Govindjee wrote:
Complicated history of a 40+ year old code.  But in short
mr( np(246) ) is the first location of an allocated block of memory.

If need be I can explicitly set up a pointer to the array, something like

    integer, pointer :: arname( : )
    arname(1:arrlen)      => mr(np(246):np(246)+arrlen-1)

I'd rather not do this if I do not need to, but it is also not a big deal if that would
take care of the problem.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Sanjay Govindjee, PhD, PE
Horace, Dorothy, and Katherine Johnson Professor in Engineering
Distinguished Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering

779 Davis Hall
University of California
Berkeley, CA 94720-1710

Voice:  +1 510 642 6060
FAX:    +1 510 643 5264
s...@berkeley.edu
https://urldefense.us/v3/__http://faculty.ce.berkeley.edu/sanjay__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!ehz0XBo49bhZyipfWPRxQNlqhVtKSPrq3HLOVdkkAI_8ML6Op73QTljYEYxjCbBRnJYZjqcpXu5s-73t7iL7HQ$ -------------------------------------------------------------------

Books:

Introduction to Mechanics of Solid Materials
https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://global.oup.com/academic/product/introduction-to-mechanics-of-solid-materials-9780192866080__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!ehz0XBo49bhZyipfWPRxQNlqhVtKSPrq3HLOVdkkAI_8ML6Op73QTljYEYxjCbBRnJYZjqcpXu5s-72wUrGTLw$
Continuum Mechanics of Solids
https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://global.oup.com/academic/product/continuum-mechanics-of-solids-9780198864721__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!ehz0XBo49bhZyipfWPRxQNlqhVtKSPrq3HLOVdkkAI_8ML6Op73QTljYEYxjCbBRnJYZjqcpXu5s-73NKzuAHQ$
Example Problems for Continuum Mechanics of Solids
https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://www.amazon.com/dp/1083047361/__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!ehz0XBo49bhZyipfWPRxQNlqhVtKSPrq3HLOVdkkAI_8ML6Op73QTljYEYxjCbBRnJYZjqcpXu5s-735DnkCuw$
Engineering Mechanics of Deformable Solids
https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://www.amazon.com/dp/0199651647__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!ehz0XBo49bhZyipfWPRxQNlqhVtKSPrq3HLOVdkkAI_8ML6Op73QTljYEYxjCbBRnJYZjqcpXu5s-70b6-U0yw$
Engineering Mechanics 3 (Dynamics) 2nd Edition
https://urldefense.us/v3/__http://www.amazon.com/dp/3642537111__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!ehz0XBo49bhZyipfWPRxQNlqhVtKSPrq3HLOVdkkAI_8ML6Op73QTljYEYxjCbBRnJYZjqcpXu5s-73QO-rr2g$
Engineering Mechanics 3, Supplementary Problems: Dynamics
https://urldefense.us/v3/__http://www.amzn.com/B00SOXN8JU__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!ehz0XBo49bhZyipfWPRxQNlqhVtKSPrq3HLOVdkkAI_8ML6Op73QTljYEYxjCbBRnJYZjqcpXu5s-71XhgI3Fw$
-------------------------------------------------------------------
NSF NHERI SimCenter
https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://simcenter.designsafe-ci.org/__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!ehz0XBo49bhZyipfWPRxQNlqhVtKSPrq3HLOVdkkAI_8ML6Op73QTljYEYxjCbBRnJYZjqcpXu5s-70kbFz5Mg$ -------------------------------------------------------------------

On 3/23/25 1:36 AM, Jose E. Roman wrote:
What is mr(np(246))? It should be an array, not a single entry of an array. As 
indicated in the list of changes, in some cases you can use the syntax [z] 
instead of z to represent an array of single value z.


El 23 mar 2025, a las 9:24, Sanjay Govindjee<s...@berkeley.edu> escribió:

Jose,
    I've tried lots of combinations but I still get the same error.  I think 
the signatures are all correct.  I've attached the routine in case you see 
something obvious.  If not I will try to make a standalone program that 
generates the same compile error.
upremas.F:66:72:

    66 |      &                               ierr)
       |                                                                        
1
Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 
'matmpibaijsetpreallocation' at (1)
upremas.F:69:72:

    69 |      &                               ierr)
       |                                                                        
1
Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 
'matseqbaijsetpreallocation' at (1)
upremas.F:75:72:

    75 |      &                             ierr)
       |                                                                        
1
Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 
'matmpiaijsetpreallocation' at (1)
upremas.F:78:72:

    78 |      &                             ierr)
       |                                                                        
1
Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 
'matseqaijsetpreallocation' at (1)

--


On 3/23/25 1:09 AM, Jose E. Roman wrote:
"use petscmat" will use those definitions.

As I said, you probably have mismatching arguments. For instance
call MatSeqAIJSetPreallocation(Mmat,
& PETSC_NULL_INTEGER_ARRAY,mr(np(246)),
& ierr)
The second argument is a PetscInt so PETSC_NULL_INTEGER_ARRAY is wrong, it 
should be PETSC_NULL_INTEGER.

Now the compiler will help you fix this kind of errors, which would go 
unnoticed before.

Jose




El 23 mar 2025, a las 9:02, Sanjay Govindjee<s...@berkeley.edu> escribió:

Jose,
What module should I be using to load petscmat.h90?
-sanjay

--

On 3/23/25 12:54 AM, Jose E. Roman wrote:

Have a look at the list of changes - it is currently 
herehttps://petsc.org/main/changes/dev/ until the new version is released. See the last 
section "Fortran".

The functions ending in "F90" have been renamed, just remove the "F90" suffix.

Regarding the info-related errors, a workaround is to append %v, for instance
mal = info(MAT_INFO_MALLOCS%v)
But Barry may want to provide a better fix for this.

Jose



El 23 mar 2025, a las 8:42, Jose E. Roman via 
petsc-users<petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov> escribió:

The Fortran interfaces for those functions are generated correctly, see 
$PETSC_ARCH/ftn/mat/petscmat.h90

For instance:

interface MatMPIBAIJSetPreallocation
subroutine MatMPIBAIJSetPreallocation(a,b,c,d,e,f, z)
import tMat
Mat :: a
PetscInt :: b
PetscInt :: c
PetscInt :: d(*)
PetscInt :: e
PetscInt :: f(*)
PetscErrorCode z
end subroutine
end interface

The compiler message is probably due to the type of an argument not matching 
the expected one. In particular, if you are passing NULL in one of the array 
arguments, you should use PETSC_NULL_INTEGER_ARRAY and not PETSC_NULL_INTEGER.

Jose



El 23 mar 2025, a las 8:25, Sanjay Govindjee via 
petsc-users<petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov> escribió:

Small update. I managed to eliminate all the errors associated with PetscViewer 
and below (it had to do with the fact that I had not yet built a module that 
was needed). The errors related to the preallocation routines still persists.
-sanjay

On 3/23/25 12:19 AM, Sanjay Govindjee wrote:

Hi Barry,
I have moved to main and rebuilt the PETSc libraries etc. Right now I am having 
trouble just getting my source code to compile. Plenty of subroutines with 
PETSc calls compile but a few are throwing errors and killing my compile. I 
suspect there will be more but if I can figure these hopefully I can debug the 
ones that will follow.
-sanjay
Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 
'matmpibaijsetpreallocation' at (1)
upremas.F:68:72:

68 | & ierr)
| 1
Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 
'matseqbaijsetpreallocation' at (1)
upremas.F:74:72:

74 | & ierr)
| 1
Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 
'matmpiaijsetpreallocation' at (1)
upremas.F:77:72:

77 | & ierr)
| 1
Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 
'matseqaijsetpreallocation' at (1)

parkv.F:58:25:

58 | PetscViewer Y_view
| 1
Error: Type name 'tpetscviewer' at (1) is ambiguous
parkv.F:69:9:

69 | endif
| 1
Error: Expecting END SUBROUTINE statement at (1)
parkv.F:72:9:

72 | endif
| 1
Error: Expecting END SUBROUTINE statement at (1)
parkv.F:91:66:

91 | call PetscViewerASCIIOpen(PETSC_COMM_WORLD,"yvec.m",Y_view,
| 1
Error: Symbol 'y_view' at (1) has no IMPLICIT type; did you mean 'yvec'?
parkv.F:65:72:

65 | call VecCreate (PETSC_COMM_WORLD, xvec, ierr)
| 1
Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 'veccreate' at (1)
parkv.F:67:72:

67 | call VecSetFromOptions(xvec, ierr)
| 1
Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 'vecsetfromoptions' at 
(1)
parkv.F:68:72:

68 | call VecDuplicate (xvec, yvec, ierr)
| 1
Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 'vecduplicate' at (1)
parkv.F:71:72:

71 | call VecDuplicate (xvec, yvec, ierr)
| 1
Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 'vecduplicate' at (1)
parkv.F:85:72:

85 | call VecAssemblyBegin(xvec, ierr)
| 1
Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 'vecassemblybegin' at (1)
parkv.F:86:72:

86 | call VecAssemblyEnd (xvec, ierr)
| 1
Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 'vecassemblyend' at (1)
parkv.F:88:72:

88 | call MatMult (Kmat, xvec, yvec, ierr)
| 1
Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 'matmult' at (1)
parkv.F:101:72:

101 | call VecGetOwnershipRange(yvec, starti, endi, ierr)
| 1
Error: There is no specific subroutine for the generic 'vecgetownershiprange' 
at (1)


-


On 3/21/25 7:17 AM, Barry Smith wrote:

I have just pushed a major update to the Fortran interface to the main PETSc 
git branch. Could you please try to work with main (to become release in a 
couple of weeks) with your Fortran code as we debug the problem? This will save 
you a lot of work and hopefully make the debugging more straightforward.

You can send the same output with the debugger if it crashes in the main branch 
and I can try to track down what is going wrong.

Barry





On Mar 21, 2025, at 12:37 AM, Sanjay Govindjee via 
petsc-users<petsc-users@mcs.anl.gov> wrote:

I am trying to upgrade my code to PETSc 3.22.4 (the code was last updated to 
3.19.4 or perhaps 3.18.1, I've lost track). I've been using this code with 
PETSc for over 20 years.

To get my code to compile and link during this update, I only need to make two 
changes; one was to use PetscViewerPushFormat instead of PetscViewerSetFormat 
and the other was to use PETSC_NULL_INTEGER_ARRAY in a spot or two.

When I run the code however, I am getting an error very early on during a call 
to MatCreate near the beginning of the code. The screen output says:
[3]PETSC ERROR: matcreate_() at 
/Users/sg/petsc-3.22.4/gnug/src/mat/utils/ftn-auto/gcreatef.c:101 Cannot create 
PETSC_NULL_XXX object
[0]PETSC ERROR: matcreate_() at 
/Users/sg/petsc-3.22.4/gnug/src/mat/utils/ftn-auto/gcreatef.c:101 Cannot create 
PETSC_NULL_XXX object
[1]PETSC ERROR: matcreate_() at 
/Users/sg/petsc-3.22.4/gnug/src/mat/utils/ftn-auto/gcreatef.c:101 Cannot create 
PETSC_NULL_XXX object
[2]PETSC ERROR: matcreate_() at 
/Users/sg/petsc-3.22.4/gnug/src/mat/utils/ftn-auto/gcreatef.c:101 Cannot create 
PETSC_NULL_XXX object
I have a 4 processor run going. I am running with -on_error_attach_debugger but 
the debugger is giving me cryptic (at least to me) output (the same for all 4 
processes modulo the PID). Stack traces seem to be unavailable :(
lldb -p 71963
(lldb) process attach --pid 71963
Process 71963 stopped
* thread #1, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = signal SIGSTOP
frame #0: 0x00007fff69d92746 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__semwait_signal + 10
libsystem_kernel.dylib`__semwait_signal:
-> 0x7fff69d92746 <+10>: jae 0x7fff69d92750 ; <+20>
0x7fff69d92748 <+12>: movq %rax, %rdi
0x7fff69d9274b <+15>: jmp 0x7fff69d9121d ; cerror
0x7fff69d92750 <+20>: retq
Target 0: (feap) stopped.

Executable module set to "/Users/sg/Feap/ver87/parfeap/feap".
Architecture set to: x86_64h-apple-macosx-.
Does anyone have any hints as to what may be going on? Note the program starts 
normally and i can do stuff with the interactive interface for the code -- even 
plotting the mesh etc. so I believe the input data has been read in correctly. 
The crash only occurs when I initiate the formation of the matrix.

I am attaching the 
/Users/sg/petsc-3.22.4/gnug/src/mat/utils/ftn-auto/gcreatef.c file in case that 
offers some insight.

Note, I have been
-sanjay
--

<gcreatef.c>

<upremas.F>


Reply via email to