I would be stunned and amazed if this worked.  Sparse factorization codes use 
very complicated data structures to store the resulting "factors" and the 
solves are complicated code that traverse through the "factor" data structures 
to perform the solve. 

  Barry


> On Nov 22, 2025, at 6:58 AM, Yin Shi <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Thank you very much for your reply. Given this, when using MUMPS in parallel, 
> I can still get the factor matrix (using getFactorMatrix method of a PC 
> object) and use it to do matrix multiplications (e.g., using matMult method 
> of the factor matrix), correct? I also would like to confirm whether the 
> factor matrix returned is really triangular and multiplying it with another 
> matrix gives the intended result.
> 
>> On Nov 16, 2025, at 08:59, Barry Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>   It appears that only MATSOLVERMKL_CPARDISO provides a parallel backward 
>> solve currently. 
>> 
>>   The only seperation of forward and backward solves in MUMPS appears to be 
>> provided with (from its users manual)
>> 
>> A special case is the one
>> where the forward elimination step is performed during factorization (see 
>> Subsection 3.8), instead of
>> during the solve phase. This allows accessing the L factors right after they 
>> have been computed, with a
>> better locality, and can avoid writing the L factors to disk in an 
>> out-of-core context. In this case (forward
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Nov 15, 2025, at 9:17 AM, Yin Shi via petsc-users 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Dear Developers,
>>> 
>>> In short, I need to explicitly use A.solveBackward(b, x) in parallel with 
>>> petsc4py, where A is a Cholesky factored matrix, but it seems that this is 
>>> not supported (e.g., for mumps and superlu_dist factorization solver 
>>> backend). Is it possible to work around this?
>>> 
>>> In detail, the problem I need to solve is to generate a set of correlated 
>>> random numbers (denoted by a vector, w) from an uncorrelated one (denoted 
>>> by a vector n). Denote the covariance matrix of n as C (symmetric). One 
>>> needs to first factorize C, C = L L^T, and then solve the linear system L^T 
>>> w = n for w in parallel. Is it possible to reformulate this problem for it 
>>> to be implemented using petsc4py?
>>> 
>>> Thank you!
>>> Yin
>> 
> 

Reply via email to